By nik
Wed May 11, 2005 3:34 pm
Lo Pass Filter wrote:In respects too the 2" comment, obviously a dedicated reel, particuarly a 1" or 2" tape machine, is going to knock Akai off it's block. Even a Studer 1/4" probably sounds quite a bit better. But even if you did purchase a Studer 1/4" 2-4 trk., your talking a $1,000+ for a couple of channels, and no mixer. A 2" is like 5 times the price. And, most any reel is going to be a maintainance monster. You have to know many things about reels and they're maintaince if you intend to operate one, and keep it functional. Prepare to get familar with schematics manuals, and a saudering gun.. And a measuring block etc.
saudering gun = Soldering iron?
The main thing with reel to reel tape machines are the heads. And the main thing with the heads is they wear out fast, especialy if you run a 2" machine at 30ips. They have to be lapped (sanded down so the worn flat head gets the correct shape again) every year or two, and this isn't a job for a Black and Decker and some 80 grit. This is a job for a specialist tape doctor with diamond polishing paper and a microscopicaly flat surface.
Other than that, there are loads of mechanical things that can go wrong, brakes and motors etc, pinch rollers wearing out or becoming hard etc. And of course you have to align the record / playback electronics every day.
Finaly, U2's last album, they compared 2" tape to proTools, and they prefered ProTools. I'm not saying they know everything, but it's interesting that the people that could use anything chose not to use 2" tape.
I used 2" for a few years back in the early 90's, they were great machines and sounded nice, but it's important not to get nostalgic when thinking about then, and remember they are expensive high maintenance machines that hiss if you turn up the treble too much.





