What makes the "sound"?

elmacaco wrote:man I've missed you ntalec, welcome back. Now it's my turn to disapear!

once again, very well put.

Yeah, been paying bills.
Hey Butcher glad you finally got your 60.

ntalec wrote:
"The ONLY thing I can find wrong about the 4000 is the sound."
If you don't like the sound of it all the rest just kinda voids out.

shut the **** up fool

better pads,better sequencer, FULL sampler,more support.

what good is it if you dont like the sound to begin with?

ntalec wrote:

elmacaco wrote:man I've missed you ntalec, welcome back. Now it's my turn to disapear!

once again, very well put.

Yeah, been paying bills.
Hey Butcher glad you finally got your 60.

yea... me too.. now i need those upgrades..

MarkWolbirgh wrote:

ntalec wrote:
"The ONLY thing I can find wrong about the 4000 is the sound."
If you don't like the sound of it all the rest just kinda voids out.

shut the **** up fool

better pads,better sequencer, FULL sampler,more support.

That's like getting a fat women and bragging saying she's a 30 or off the scale cause she big as three dimes.

Calling names doesn't really change anything, just helps to explain why someone would buy a piece of gear and say the only problem with it is the sound.

And you guys wonder what happened to music.

butcher wrote:

ntalec wrote:

elmacaco wrote:man I've missed you ntalec, welcome back. Now it's my turn to disapear!

once again, very well put.

Yeah, been paying bills.
Hey Butcher glad you finally got your 60.

yea... me too.. now i need those upgrades..

I would say at least go ahead and get the O.S., that will put you in the 3k operating game which is mandatory for the 60.

He didn't say the 4000 sounded bad, just that the 3000 sounded better, by how much? who knows, but I don't see anything wrong with his decision.

3.10 for the 60 is mandatory as far as I'm concerned. I would like to hear from hardcore 2.xx OS users, just cuz somepeople have OS 2.xx for a while before they get the upgrade

well ill let u in on my frustrations so far...firstly...i keep forgetting to not sequence until i sample all my sounds... cuz everytime you sample ur sequence gets erased.. second.. i been sitting here and im pretty sure there is no way to chop on the 2.12... third... 5 second sample limit for each sample...WTFFFF..fourth... cant change a sound to note off so when u let go of pad it stops.... other than that im already feelin it way more than my 2kxl i sold... witht he upgrades im 100% this machine is for me...

Damn it's funny you can feel it even with those limitations.

i like limitations..i think it makes me more creative ... but 2.12 limits are a little much...and i like the overall feel of the 60 compared to the 2kxl...i love how everythign is basically on a huge button...its great..

Yeah it is, isnt it It's funny, I got bit by the 60 bug really inexplicably, and my friends were all tellin me to get a 2000 and about all the features, and I was like, nah, I know the 60 is for me. It was my first sampler besides the sk-1.

butcher wrote:well ill let u in on my frustrations so far...firstly...i keep forgetting to not sequence until i sample all my sounds... cuz everytime you sample ur sequence gets erased.. second.. i been sitting here and im pretty sure there is no way to chop on the 2.12... third... 5 second sample limit for each sample...WTFFFF..fourth... cant change a sound to note off so when u let go of pad it stops.... other than that im already feelin it way more than my 2kxl i sold... witht he upgrades im 100% this machine is for me...

Man its been sooo long i didnt realise i had these limits to work around before i upgraded...WOW

wait till u upgrade.....
DR Dre gon be scared o' u son!!!

when do the upgrades arrive? Have u shipped off the MK II to the eventual 'Prize Winner' yet?

H*

dude that won emailed me and told me he wanted a mpc2000 and bid on mine on accident...im kinda hppy in a way cuz i think i can getg more... its actually for sale in the for sale section if anybody is interested.. in great shape...and will be shipped out asap..

elmacaco wrote:He didn't say the 4000 sounded bad, just that the 3000 sounded better, by how much? who knows, but I don't see anything wrong with his decision.

3.10 for the 60 is mandatory as far as I'm concerned. I would like to hear from hardcore 2.xx OS users, just cuz somepeople have OS 2.xx for a while before they get the upgrade

Nah El his exact words were:

"The ONLY thing I can find wrong about the 4000 is the sound.If I wanted something pristine, clean, shiny , I'd use a computer. "

elmacaco wrote:Yeah it is, isnt it It's funny, I got bit by the 60 bug really inexplicably, and my friends were all tellin me to get a 2000 and about all the features, and I was like, nah, I know the 60 is for me. It was my first sampler besides the sk-1.

ooooooooooh the casio sk1! that was my first sampler too. i still got that ****