By izm
Thu Jun 23, 2005 4:22 pm
Anyone knows if Akai wants to upgrade the current version of mpc 1k??
DJ Premier wrote:...A lot of new cats out now do not know the history.
sparq wrote:this has been discussed in grave detail (meaning quite a few posts and threads) .
ONE wrote:Oh Yeah...BTW...It's Dope Bitchezzzzz. With or without timestretch and reverse.

ONE wrote:Oh Yeah...BTW...It's Dope Bitchezzzzz. With or without timestretch and reverse.

pad-ophiliac wrote:ONE wrote:Oh Yeah...BTW...It's Dope Bitchezzzzz. With or without timestretch and reverse.
no doubt. time is easy as fuk in audacity and i don't know, it seems like its more rewarding to manual chop or sumtin. but now that i'm good at that i probably, uhm, definitly would use that function if they gave it to us.
Lampdog wrote:ONE wrote:Oh Yeah...BTW...It's Dope Bitchezzzzz. With or without timestretch and reverse.
Yeah, I can imagine it is, it's an MPC. I don't see why people just can't accept it and move on.

The Beat Conductor wrote:In issue number four of Scratch Magazine (March/April 2005), there is a one page article on the pros and cons of the MPC 1000 and there is a little something at the bottom of that page...
[Ed.'s Note: According to Akai, the following weaknesses will be addressed in a software update sometime in 2005.] Lacks trim/edit functions such as zoning, reverse, and timestretch. A computer is necessary to overcome these limitations.
That was the exact thing written on page 94 of that issue...
DJ Premier wrote:...A lot of new cats out now do not know the history.


The Beat Conductor wrote:Most people on this forum are really lazy and don't want to search...