By elmacaco
Tue Aug 02, 2005 6:01 pm
right on rookie.
No one is using an MPC so to it's fullest so as to need another one.
No one is using an MPC so to it's fullest so as to need another one.

elmacaco wrote:right on rookie.
No one is using an MPC so to it's fullest so as to need another one.
rookie wrote:look an mpc4000 give you access to 96 sounds at onetime,plus whatever modules or keyboards you use and can sequence, whats the purpose for 2&3 mps? some folks can't even work the little stuff they have now,give me a break.

blkhersheybar wrote:When I read the first post in this thread (which quotes a post from the Future Producers web site), it seems to refer to a TECHNIQUE, not the convenience of having more sounds or outputs available.
R. Kelly is not known for using a wide variety of drum sounds or the frequent use of samples. In fact, his sounds are usually very basic. I really believe the so-called "trick" has to do with programming. It could be related to quantizing and timing. We'll have to wait and see if anything else gets revealed.
Just one newbie's humble opinion.

BBoy2005 wrote:anyone ever thought of having an extra MPC in the men's room ?
you know, to drop beats while you drop something else ?
blkhersheybar wrote:R. Kelly is not known for using a wide variety of drum sounds or the frequent use of samples. In fact, his sounds are usually very basic.

peezie wrote:then why would you even need more than one mp?blkhersheybar wrote:R. Kelly is not known for using a wide variety of drum sounds or the frequent use of samples. In fact, his sounds are usually very basic.

Smoove03 wrote:BBoy2005 wrote:anyone ever thought of having an extra MPC in the men's room ?
you know, to drop beats while you drop something else ?
lol wtf

4dahaterz wrote:BassLINE wrote:I figured people preferred MPC's because of their incredible sequencing and ability to control other devices. I mean, if you're not going to use them for what they're best at then you should seek out cheaper alternatives to play back samples right? I still can't think of anytime where I've needed even 32 samples (2 banks) much less 256. I guess my style is more stripped down. I also organize my **** so I don't have unnecessary sounds in a program. One program per track.
I still can't see how you can justify more than one MPC in sequencing. That Dre example only proved that most people are just lazy rather than actually NEEDING more than one MPC. Can't be bothered to change disks? WTF?
Must be nice to have money to burn like that.
no offense, but that a weak arguement
dude... check this out, MPC's load slowwwww.... verrrryyyy slowwwww, so that will slow down his production time, or anyone elses for that matter that needs to access all of their programs or sounds, and actually, if you think only using MPC for MIDI only, then u gotta be sick... u missing out on a lot more, yeah, u can use other things, but why when ya MPC can do that too, and u can fatten sounds, anyway, thats another topic.... but anyway, thats of topic, the main thing is, if u can only use 256 sounds, and u need access to all of yours samples, which me personally, i have over 10 Gigs of sounds for my MPC, most which i still havent even heard all of, and im sure some are the same, or somewhat similar...but its not lazy to be rushing, its lazy when u wanna sit around and wait, when u can be making more music, and much more dough, by a lil investment... a couple of MPC's, ok yea, the cost might be right around $10,000... versus making tracks that could end up making you 5 times the amount plus more... ya gotta think... but then again, your production style maybe different, so i cant be mad at ya for doing what you do, people use different methods, maybe u using your exact Motif of Triton Drums works for you, if so, much propz