How good does the 3000 really sound

I just posted tis on the 2000XL board, but just in case I hope you guys can give honest opinions about the 3000´s sound. Do it´s converters really produce a better sound than the cheaper MPC´s?


"I I just sampled the same sounds to my 2000XL and my ASR 10.
The ASR 10 sounds so much better it´s almost weird.

the ASR sounds fuller and "less choppy"... makes everything smoother and in my opinion, more high quality.

It´s wack since the 2000XL and ASR are both 16-bit samplers... it really must be the converters that make the difference. What if I solely used the digital in and out on the XL? Would that change things for the better?

How much betterare the MPC 3000´s converters (it´s natural sound) compared to the 2000 XL? is it anywhere near the difference I found in these two?"

The Recluse

found it... thanks to TruPro.

Thanks to TruPro? Where he said:

"The ones on the 2000 & 2000XL are 'cleaner' than the 3000. The 3000 is older, and at the time it was pretty high quality"

http://www.mpc-forums.com/viewtopic.php?t=4345

The 3000 is older, and at the time it was pretty high quality. However, it is not 16 bit.

i dunno if money is sure about that.

do waht you did with the asr and then make up your mind.

phukk the homo below!!!

somebody delete this whole sh it. its gettin a lil........