By flipnile
Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:01 am
Yeah, they are a little pricey... especially for the 45 covers. I'm almost to the point of making my own makeshift covers (for the 45s) out of construction paper or something.
By dj e.d.e
Sat Jan 07, 2006 7:20 am
damn i was think about doin that last week cause i was checkin out some of my 45's and i was like damn i need to cover some of these and i thought how can i cover them , with paper, but thats alot if you think about it, but actually the 45 cover are not that bad 50 for 13 bucks .
By flipnile
Sat Jan 07, 2006 2:39 pm
Yeah, you're right. I must have been thinking of the LP covers (I have a number of records with no cover).
By c.toon
Sat Jan 07, 2006 4:56 pm
Yo homie,
check for "japanese plastic sleeves". They have a sticky part on the back so you can close it totally! Plus they are totally seethrough, not like these milky looking scuffed junky sleeves. Perhaps not the best for records you pull out and play frequently but perfect for the holy grails of your collection. They also keep the cover & the record 100% dust free, what could you want more
p.s. be carefull though. I heard of quite some people **** / tearing up their covers by accidently putting the sleeve on wrong and ripping the sticky part of it off the cover
uch:..
check for "japanese plastic sleeves". They have a sticky part on the back so you can close it totally! Plus they are totally seethrough, not like these milky looking scuffed junky sleeves. Perhaps not the best for records you pull out and play frequently but perfect for the holy grails of your collection. They also keep the cover & the record 100% dust free, what could you want more
p.s. be carefull though. I heard of quite some people **** / tearing up their covers by accidently putting the sleeve on wrong and ripping the sticky part of it off the cover
uch:..
R.I.P. James Yancey