
By IlikeMypocketsFat
Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:27 am
muscle wrote:I think the mc-808 is better then the "current" mpc-1000 IMO. No time stretching?!?come on.
The wise man laughs this off
I Like My Pockets Fat, Not Flat

muscle wrote:I think the mc-808 is better then the "current" mpc-1000 IMO. No time stretching?!?come on.

IlikeMypocketsFat wrote:The wise man laughs this off

Yoshimi wrote:I don't trust roland with anything that has built in sounds and was made after 1990.

JIHAD7234 wrote:What you got to say now?

adl1 wrote:it looks like ****, expensive ****.. no lcd screen? who the **** needs motorized faders in a sampler???

*valentin* wrote:My friend is says, the SP 606 is better than the 1000, and i say the 1000 is better. i dont want him to buy no bullishhh, so can anyone tell me why the 1000 murders the 606? like i said i never worked wit a 606 but i still think its wacc.

Mr modnaR wrote:
SP606: 4 MIDI tracks, 18,000 note limit, 8-Voice polyphony, Light-up pads.
MPC1000: 64 MIDI tracks, 100,000 note limit, 32-Voice polyphony, Non-light-up pads.
Need i say more?
szczypta radosci wrote:hehehe. this is ****.look for a pads.akai have the best.if you make hiphop beats choose akai - the hiphop brand