By truvc
Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:09 pm
LEVELS
Here is my (updated) guess. i just reloade os1.07, and the volume seems to have more dynamic in the new os ( = bigger sonic difference beetween 0 and 100 in os 2.10).
And i think it is a good think.
so i think that strong volume pads (over 80) have more volume in the new os, and need to be lowered a bit. (and very low volume pads needs to be turned up a bit maybe).
----
ENVELOPE
on 2.10 though i got strange results with the amp enveloppe. with a bass drum (a BD and a sub layered), if i turn the attack a bit up (around 10 maybe) an lower the decay a bit (around 60 maybe), i get first a normal slow attack sound and then in the middle of the sound there is a bit with a very short attack.
in other words it does woooTAK.
anybody noticed that ?
-----
FOOTSWITCH
and now footswitch to note repeat works! sweet! i might get a second footswitch.
Antonym wrote:sparq any idea as to why the os change is effecting some people's beats? it did to a couple of mine...fixing them isn't hard and is not worth complaining about, but i'm curious to know why that happened?
Here is my (updated) guess. i just reloade os1.07, and the volume seems to have more dynamic in the new os ( = bigger sonic difference beetween 0 and 100 in os 2.10).
And i think it is a good think.
so i think that strong volume pads (over 80) have more volume in the new os, and need to be lowered a bit. (and very low volume pads needs to be turned up a bit maybe).
----
ENVELOPE
on 2.10 though i got strange results with the amp enveloppe. with a bass drum (a BD and a sub layered), if i turn the attack a bit up (around 10 maybe) an lower the decay a bit (around 60 maybe), i get first a normal slow attack sound and then in the middle of the sound there is a bit with a very short attack.
in other words it does woooTAK.
anybody noticed that ?
-----
FOOTSWITCH
and now footswitch to note repeat works! sweet! i might get a second footswitch.



