MPC 3000-OS DISC

anybody have any links to the os 4.0? tried looking at the akai site but did not come up with anything.

carlos

wow.

OK. Open season, boys.

try checkin up your ass cuz you aint findin it online
4.0
had to crack on you

One of the guys, "PEEZIE" was taking having a joke with you when he said "OS 4.0 and 128 meg of RAM":

This post to be precise:

http://www.mpc-forums.com/viewtopic.php ... 128+meg+os

The most recent OS for the MPC3000 is version 3.16, a re-development in progress. Being developed by me ...

The floppy boot version of same is currently being hosted at the www.mpc3000.com website courtesy of Mike ( User: MPC3000 ) Goins ...

http://www.mpc3000.com/updated_os.htm

Thanks again to Mike for hosting the OS download to date.

Thanks to those who are ROM CHIPPED up for supporting the project so far.

As many of you know, development is on-going.

Thanks,

Rohan.

ha ha very funny(not). ok you got me. just trying to ask a question and get a joke of an answer from a dookey shoe ass wannabe producer-engineer mastering lab fool. anyhow thanks to the ones that are not being dooky heads.

rohan,

whens the new 60 os drop?? please?
peace.

incurablebeatlust wrote:rohan,
whens the new 60 os drop?? please?
peace.

What new 60 os

Rohan.

the new os you are slaving away on for the 60 so you can bless the 60 users..j/k..the 60 is good as it is but da/\/\n..developments could be made, im not compalining htough...

incurablebeatlust wrote:the new os you are slaving away on for the 60 so you can bless the 60 users..j/k..the 60 is good as it is but da/\/\n..developments could be made, im not compalining htough...

Any developments, myth or reality ... will be announced in due course.

Thanks,

Rohan.

peezie wrote::shock:

Peezie, I think you started this one!!! I think I just pissssssed myself!!!

mpc3000le wrote:
Any developments, myth or reality ... will be announced in due course.

Thats was extremely cagey.....

Are you working on a 60 OS? I need more RAM while you're at it, and a filter.

i thought that the 3.1 o/s on the 60 basically took up all the memory. In the manual i thought roger linn said they had to work a lot on making 3.1 compact so that it would work on the 60 as well as the 3k. so if u where gogn to have another o/s wouldn't u have to sacrifice some features to add other features?

rokuez wrote:i thought that the 3.1 o/s on the 60 basically took up all the memory. In the manual i thought roger linn said they had to work a lot on making 3.1 compact so that it would work on the 60 as well as the 3k. so if u where gogn to have another o/s wouldn't u have to sacrifice some features to add other features?

That's a good point rokuez but some programmers are better than others and may be able to write cleaner, more efficient code so that features could be added without any sacrifices.

2wice wrote:

rokuez wrote:i thought that the 3.1 o/s on the 60 basically took up all the memory. In the manual i thought roger linn said they had to work a lot on making 3.1 compact so that it would work on the 60 as well as the 3k. so if u where gogn to have another o/s wouldn't u have to sacrifice some features to add other features?

That's a good point rokuez but some programmers are better than others and may be able to write cleaner, more efficient code so that features could be added without any sacrifices.

So is this something you are claiming "and may be able to write cleaner more efficient code" or do you actually code and know this for a fact about the o/s? typically o/s upgrades require more memory then the previous ones, and i've never seen this not to be the case [i'm not talking about o/s patches or bug fixes].