Technical questions for the MPC2000xl and the MPC2000
User avatar
By fareed Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:03 pm
Sup peoples, I have a choice between a 2000 classic with everything but the effects card or a XL with no options but 32 megs of memory. Which would you get?
User avatar

By Grouphome Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:09 pm
I would take the 2000
the output option is too important for me
User avatar

By hydroslanger Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:15 pm
the xl is much better me. the 2000 is a 3000 without the nice sound(thats how I feel). the xl has importaint options like chopping and timestretch and its smaller. if you really need the outputs just buy one for it if the 2 are the same price.
User avatar

By Grouphome Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:17 pm
I have both the 2000 and the 3000
I think that the sound difference is minimal
its still garbage in garbage out
User avatar

By hydroslanger Sun Feb 19, 2006 5:18 pm
i have an xl and 3000, if the 3000 didnt sound as good as it does than I wouldnt keep it around cause the options suck on it.
User avatar

By pt3r Sun Feb 19, 2006 8:11 pm
go for the xl instead of the classic. You're much more limited in storage options on the mpc 2000 than on the mpc 2000 xl.
User avatar

By fareed Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:00 pm
Good looks.

By mrnymms Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:41 am
XL with a card reader , and 8 outs . and to pass on a tillted screen it is called a sore neck.