bees80 wrote:really? you mean when the mpc60 got out it was also a ''not-quite-ready, half stillborn product'' ?
Those where other days, the real explosion of electronic ratrace was somewhere in the late nineties / early 2K. Probably because the massive relocationing of manufacturing to low salary nations, mainly china. That gave Texas horsetraders and British potatofarmers a chance to broaden their product range with a top notch, multiple in/out professional audio interface. It brought prices down but at the same time stressed up the need to produce new models with fancy names and specs, or like the MPC 1000 repackage it to rip people off through their vanity.
bees80 wrote:wy try to waste it ?..
Well, I guess it´s called competition, the very foundation of capitalism.
bees80 wrote:actually, i never got problems with my mp3 player, my TFT screen or my mobile.. or are those electronic products not ''complicated'' enough?
First of all, you probably do not interact that much with those devices. Second, no, for a user it´s not as demanding stuff as a MPC, ask an engineer or a person giving service to such devices and he/she will probably think it´s a shitty product sold with sleazy measures.
bees80 wrote:agree, but actually nobody knows their own needs for the full 100 %.. it's just a trial and error game.
That´s true.
bees80 wrote:by the way, i'm actually not complaining
Yes you do...
bees80 wrote:but i just think it's a bit lame on how akai handled this situations.. couldn't they waited some time and tested better instead of **** with peoples brains and getting them to hesitate if they spent their money right?
...and the above proves it.
bees80 wrote:hey dude slow it down, i was just asking for some opinions
I gave you mine.
bees80 wrote:im not surprised by this, i think it's just **** lame
Once again, that´s capitalism. The fact of lameness applies to Akai as well as Roland, Novation, Digidesign, Volvo, Kellogs or whoever else that tickle your vanity, twist your head and rips you off.
You go buy,
anything, you feed them and you are being lamed.
bees80 wrote:i don't care about paying money for a GOOD machine, but i DON'T like paying money for a ''not-quite-ready, half stillborn product''..
Nobody wants to buy a bad unit. Just listen to these guys for a pedagogical example:
"****, I need at least a Pro Tools HD to keep it tight!"
"This Tascam cassette 4 track from -87 will give me the grunge I´m after."
"A vintage Gibson or asian Stratocaster copy? I just want to play riffs!"
"Hello, I have a PC, an Art preamp and a M-Audio interface, will my tracks sound better if I buy a UREI LA 2?"
Which of the above will get a GOOD machine? Which will get a BAD? Which of the above are most likely to regret their decisions?
I don´t know.
What I know is that I read up on the MPC 1000 thoroughly and had much doubts before I decided to get it. In the end it´s pros outweighed it´s cons and I have not regretted my decision yet, I´m actually liking this unit better and better over time. I never expect to get anything more than what is flagged by manufacturer
and users. I don´t expect any commercial enterprise to be less lame or of higher morality than that of most-money-out-of-least-investment, unless it´s a clearly enthausiast driven business.
bees80 wrote:but hey ; that's the world nowadays isn't it? screwing people over and over.. yeaaa right
I believe it is, yes. Unless you work in a DIY enviroment with a strict non profit approach.[/b]