Post your views and questions about the Akai MPC2500
User avatar
By yepz Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:04 am
I have a XL and i was thinking about switching to the 2500. i just wanted to know if you could in the trim/loop screen change the pitch/tune and if the MPC then displays the new current BPM like the XL ?.


Other then that what are the main options/funtions the 2500 the XL does not have ?
User avatar

By The Maker Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:27 am
One thing people never mention is that the 2500 is fast.
It does things so quickly you wonder if it did it or not.
User avatar

By yepz Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:30 am
Cool, but can you find the BPM of a sample on the 2500 ? cause i know the MPC 1000 BPM detect is a JOKE!!!!!
User avatar

By The Maker Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:53 am
Let's just say it not like the one on the XL at all.
AT ALL!!!
User avatar

By jwhaatt07 Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:02 am
The Maker wrote:One thing people never mention is that the 2500 is fast.
It does things so quickly you wonder if it did it or not.


LOL !
User avatar

By mike roca Mon Aug 21, 2006 1:23 am
yeah its in the trim/loop mode. its helped me out a couple of times but it has its errors.
User avatar

By yepz Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:16 am
Then im gonna stick with the XL.

PS: why is Akai pumping out junk ?
User avatar

By King_Vitamin Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:12 am
I've made my peace with my 2500. Aside from some of the sample screen options like section merge and the bpm detect thing mentioned, i do prefer it over the xl which is what i came from. It has it quirks but is still very usable. Now would definetly be the time to cop one too...they don't seem to be fetching more than $1200 on ebay.
User avatar

By selecta jo Mon Aug 21, 2006 7:50 pm
the problem with the proper beat detection on the 2500 and the 1000 is due to the fact akai doesn´t state in the manual that the mpc does beat count only with one bar loops. try it and you´ll see that is as useful as chop shop.
if you are only messing around with long loops and you are not able to tap in the tempo with the tap tempo button maybe a rhythmical hobby isn not the right one for you. i assume you can´t play a steinway grand piano or a stradivari to perfection, does that mean they are bad instruments?
i cannot believe what arguments some people think of when looking at new gear.

peace jo
User avatar

By jahrome Mon Aug 21, 2006 9:29 pm
But....Akai didn't have to re-invent the wheel. The BPM detect works great on the XL. The 2500 should perform the same way.....

By Otayo20 Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:27 pm
It never really worked for me. It's more of a joke than anything else. If they make record players to detect BPM's there's no reason why the 2500 would work so crapy.
User avatar

By yepz Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:07 am
selecta jo wrote:
i assume you can´t play a steinway grand piano or a stradivari to perfection, does that mean they are bad instruments?

peace jo


Last time i checked Steinway does not advertise that there pianos have a "beat detect" funtion.

Tool
User avatar

By jahrome Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:26 am
Otayo20 wrote:
It never really worked for me. It's more of a joke than anything else. If they make record players to detect BPM's there's no reason why the 2500 would work so crapy.


If I thought the MPC 2500 was crappy, I would get an MPC that is not crappy. That's just me personally.......

By Otayo20 Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:31 am
jahrome wrote:
Otayo20 wrote:
It never really worked for me. It's more of a joke than anything else. If they make record players to detect BPM's there's no reason why the 2500 would work so crapy.


If I thought the MPC 2500 was crappy, I would get an MPC that is not crappy. That's just me personally.......


that would be refering to the bpm detection. but thanx for the advice.
User avatar

By jahrome Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:34 am
No problem. I try to do, what I can do, when I can do it :D