Talk about the music biz - marketing, promotions, contract law, copyright etc...
User avatar

By jazzbee Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:28 pm
As well as being good at managing people Diddy is one hell of a business man!
By rekidxkavada Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:49 pm
bboutit wrote:
Fire Productionz wrote:
rickrock305 wrote:
cooocooo1 wrote:its called PRODUCING people.....




something that is lost nowadays. People think they bang out a track on the MPC, send it to an artist and they've "produced" something. lol. You aint nothing more than a programmer or arranger if thats all you did.



YES! I totally agree. Making a beat, and making a Hit Song are two completely different accomplishments. A Hit Song is something far more difficult to make than simply a beat. Does anyone agree that the terms "Beatmaker" and "Producer" are used incorrectly in todays music scene?


Co-Sign, ppl often misconstrue the two so grossly that I don't bother to explain the difference.



Producer lost all it's meaning as much as *****.

where all my producin ****** at :D
User avatar

By mindcontrol Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:09 am
im not sure if i can totally agree with what is being said in here. i personally dont think u need soo much stuff to make a beat. i mean i was watching black milk on youtube banging out a track on the mpc. it was hot and hes like "this is nothing, i mean as u can see there isnt much in here, only my mpc turntable. I will take it to the bigger studio later and mess with some more keyboards and sh!t" he had like alooottttt of equipment there in his little basement. i mean he can do everything in there, make the beat, edit it, do whatever to it, and finally have a master copy.

maybe its only me but it seems like some people do too much to the music with all this editing and stuff. many of these beats that have gone thru a fully loaded studio sound just the same as mine do lol. like seriously. ok sometimes not, but most of the time those same beats sound pretty much the same as all the other beats i hear. no REAL significant difference. i dont know if its only me? obviously some ppl do a terrible job with their beats and could need mastering but the ppl that know what they are doing for the most part can make their beats sound balanced.

wow thats alot of typing :roll:
User avatar

By rickrock305 Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:04 pm
mindcontrol wrote: but most of the time those same beats sound pretty much the same as all the other beats i hear. no REAL significant difference. i dont know if its only me?




yep, its just you.
User avatar

By mindcontrol Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:07 pm
rickrock305 wrote:
mindcontrol wrote: but most of the time those same beats sound pretty much the same as all the other beats i hear. no REAL significant difference. i dont know if its only me?




yep, its just you.


nah i seriously doubt its just me. i know that im not def.

By cooocooo1 Tue Sep 19, 2006 6:52 pm
it REALLY is just you...
User avatar

By mindcontrol Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:51 pm
cooocooo1 wrote:it REALLY is just you...


well im not sure if u guys fully understood what i meant then. let me try and make it short. i do acknowledge that alot of tracks do sound better when they are mastered in a fully equipped studio. but, if the person knows what they are doing they can achieve the same sound with software, or with their own personal studio. IF the person knows what they are doing that is

can we agree on that?
User avatar

By StonesThrow Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:48 pm
mindcontrol wrote:
cooocooo1 wrote:it REALLY is just you...


well im not sure if u guys fully understood what i meant then. let me try and make it short. i do acknowledge that alot of tracks do sound better when they are mastered in a fully equipped studio. but, if the person knows what they are doing they can achieve the same sound with software, or with their own personal studio. IF the person knows what they are doing that is

can we agree on that?

somewhat yes. But thats not what your original point was at all.
User avatar

By mindcontrol Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:44 pm
mindcontrol wrote:im not sure if i can totally agree with what is being said in here. i personally dont think u need soo much stuff to make a beat. i mean i was watching black milk on youtube banging out a track on the mpc. it was hot and hes like "this is nothing, i mean as u can see there isnt much in here, only my mpc turntable. I will take it to the bigger studio later and mess with some more keyboards and sh!t" he had like alooottttt of equipment there in his little basement. i mean he can do everything in there, make the beat, edit it, do whatever to it, and finally have a master copy.

maybe its only me but it seems like some people do too much to the music with all this editing and stuff. many of these beats that have gone thru a fully loaded studio sound just the same as mine do lol. like seriously. ok sometimes not, but most of the time those same beats sound pretty much the same as all the other beats i hear. no REAL significant difference. i dont know if its only me? obviously some ppl do a terrible job with their beats and could need mastering but the ppl that know what they are doing for the most part can make their beats sound balanced.

wow thats alot of typing :roll:


well here im quoting myself and i actually think its fairly accurate to my point. i say here in the last part

"obviously some ppl do a terrible job with their beats and could need mastering but the ppl that know what they are doing for the most part can make their beats sound balanced."

which is the same point i tried to convey here:

"but, if the person knows what they are doing they can achieve the same sound with software, or with their own personal studio. IF the person knows what they are doing that is"
User avatar

By rickrock305 Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:07 pm
"Balanced" and "Mixed" are two different things. Sure, the average person can balance their stuff, but the average person CAN'T mix their stuff. They just don't have the experience/ears/equipment/monitoring setup/etc.
User avatar

By mindcontrol Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:03 pm
rickrock305 wrote:"Balanced" and "Mixed" are two different things. Sure, the average person can balance their stuff, but the average person CAN'T mix their stuff. They just don't have the experience/ears/equipment/monitoring setup/etc.


fair enough. when i said balanced/mixed i meant the end result sounding good. and i understand that the average person isnt skilled. but those ppl that are accustomed to the equipment/software that they use, 50% atleast are able to produce good sounding stuff.

thats how i feel.
User avatar

By rickrock305 Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:50 pm
mindcontrol wrote: 50% atleast are able to produce good sounding stuff.




apparently you and i have different ideas of "good sounding". Because I'd say the percentage is MUCH less.
User avatar

By Upright Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:16 am
ZAM13 wrote:DAMN....I flipped that same sample .... oh well there goes another one thats worthless now. i hate when this happens ,and to top it off puffy and snoop no less :evil:


LOL.....