New to the MPC production world? Got a music production question that's not really specific to any particular MPC? Try your luck here and get help from our experienced members.
By thomas_crown Wed Nov 29, 2006 3:10 pm
i really have not understood the mpc use utnil now..is it necessary if you do not sample?if you have already a workstation like korg triton is it necessary?if yes in what way?
User avatar

By Lampdog Wed Nov 29, 2006 4:31 pm
An mpc is not necessary to make music.

I can make songs on my Triton Extreme standalone.

I can make music on my ASR10 stand alone.

I choose to use the mpc cause of the pads and EASY
as hell interface, and fun factor involved.

Most of the time, for each and every person, they get a different feeling
with each machine they use. MPC just has a mythical feeling to it that you just can't shake once you've used one, you just have to have one.

It's a beautiful thing!
.
User avatar

By Lampdog Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:25 pm
What exactly are you trying to understand?
User avatar

By RealWorldDealings Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:33 pm
they do the same thing, one has keys, one has pads...figure out whats best for you....
By thomas_crown Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:38 pm
for beats that require drum n bass,jungle music and some techno which might be better?which might fullfill my requirements better?or id does not have to do with the music style?
By thomas_crown Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:01 pm
what's the advantage of an mpc comparing to a synth?(besides the ad of someone saying he prefers buttons to keys)i mean,a normal mpv has more sounds than a normal synth?
User avatar
By RealWorldDealings Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:16 pm
thomas_crown wrote:what's the advantage of an mpc comparing to a synth?(besides the ad of someone saying he prefers buttons to keys)i mean,a normal mpv has more sounds than a normal synth?


there is no advantage, its simply preference...In fact, if you're comparing to a synth, which I don't understand why that comparison would be made, wait, why would one compare a Midi Production Center to a synthesizer??? I don't see the comarison at all...
User avatar

By enotide Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:33 pm
I prefer programing on the MPC as apposed to programing on a Keyboard, It's all about what fits your work flow better.

By Mr.Qwiq Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:41 pm
The sequencer alone is just so easy to use as compared to most synths. An MPC should be the heart of your studio making everything else come together. I build my gear up around it. For instance does this piece of new gear compliment it well or not? My mpc just enhances my other equipment to me but thats just my opinion. Or i just might be crazy. In any case there is no comparison until u acually sit down with the triton and mpc standalone. You will have to figure it out for yourself.

By fader-pro Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:14 pm
I use the MPC in almost every recording. It could be anything from the "click track" to a full blown sequence using samples and anything in between. It's nice to have the ability to go in after a session and add little "accent" parts via the MPC. Mostly I use it as a sequencer and drum sampler. I've got roughly a dozen pieces of MIDI gear controlled by the MPC. Even on a recording with the MPC playing nothing but click, I have it bring up the correct settings on my MIDI outboard effects processors.

As you know the MPC is not the only way to do this, it's just a matter of choice. I sometimes will have to switch between several projects in a day or even in a session. Between automated mixers and the MPC, I can call up a complicated mix, complete with FX in under a minute. Used to be it took so long to bring up a mix I quit working on "personal" projects after work because it was such a hassle.