Can't decide which MPC to choose? Read these resources or post your questions here.

By marino Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:16 am
well lets see your an advanced member cause??
1. all you do is post retarted answers
2. dont have a life so you browse forums to post retarted answers
3. dont have skills
4.dont have any equipment so you cant post a real answer
5.maybe you dont have a b*itch??
But I do your mother !!! :lol:
p.s! you should just name yourself groove 69 :lol:
User avatar

By Groove66 Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:23 am
marino wrote:well lets see your an advanced member cause??
1. all you do is post retarted answers
2. dont have a life so you browse forums to post retarted answers
3. dont have skills
4.dont have any equipment so you cant post a real answer
5.maybe you dont have a b*itch??
But I do your mother !!! :lol:
p.s! you should just name yourself groove 69 :lol:



Thanks. Now that you have showed and proved that you are under age for this forum, can i kindly ask you to leave? I'm sure you will do so.

Now run along back to mama

By marino Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:38 am
dont think so euro trip :twisted:

By elitethatsme Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:35 pm
Situation: Someone asks a question that has been answered before.

4 ways of handling it.

1. Answer it

2. Dont

3. Refer him to a previous thread where this has been answered

4. Act like an **** and say some childish internet forum looser shit like "RTFM"

The majority of this thread has chosin #4 the majority of this site continuously chooses #4 in all situations. If i was a mod of this site I would clean that shit up real quick because it does not look good for whoever runs this site. Yall talkin about this kids age level but if you were at all mature you would have chosen options 1-3, plain and simple.

By marino Fri Feb 16, 2007 6:05 pm
word
User avatar

By fasttrackpimp Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:00 pm
I would get the 3000. I personally don't own one, but have used one multiple times. It has the 8 outs already like the newer mpc's and an analog feel,which is a plus for me because I dislike the newer digital type.Computer connectivity isn't really something I look for in a sampler. My work flow is best on the 3000.
User avatar

By DJIO Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:59 pm
yeah, anyone who knows their history knows the 3000 is the king of mpc's. the 4 midi outs is dope. the main reason I use the 2000xl bcuz of the wave form editing for choping and slicing(yea I use my ear as well but the waveform helps a great deal). if I had the money or caught a agood deal I would buy a 3000 and use both
User avatar

By fasttrackpimp Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:21 pm
DJIO wrote: if I had the money or caught a agood deal I would buy a 3000 and use both



The price that most of the 3000's go for is the reason I went with the 2000.I got my 2000 for $630 and at that time the cheapest 3000's I saw was around $1600-$1700(which if I had the money would have gladly spent).

By lee majors Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:50 am
Tough one. Prolly cop the MPC2500 or the Mpc 4000. Thing is, Im a 2000 classic user so the 2500 would be my first choice. Ease of transition is a major issue. Plus, Im not 19 anymore so I really don't won't to have to go back to the drawing board and have to learn the mpc over with the 4000. However, I'd love to have the adat of the 4000 connected to my 1814 firewire with the i/o dedicated to something else(motif es). If i had to do it over, Mpc 2500+macbook pro+battery 3+sampletank+recycle+soundforge+logic = a day called. good luck with your music/decision. One
User avatar

By Infinitarchitect Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:57 am
I have an MPC 2000 Classic but I'm about to purchase a MPC 2500. I love my 2000 but I've found that the 32mb of ram is a limitation to me in some respects. Not that I CAN'T get funky on my MPC 2000 because you definitely can without a doubt, but the way I wanted to work is use my MPC for most of the beginning sequencing of a track and that sample time is just not enough.

Plus if you've invested in using a computer to record your audio it's more difficult to integrate the older MPC's with software, plus I've tired of looking at this stupid Zip drive with 100mb of space give me a break, I've got like almost of terabyte of samples on external USB drives and I've got to deal with keeping track of all these zip discs lol.

But seriously I love my MPC 2000 believe me I just got it recently but after working all my shit out I would be better suited for a newer MPC. Choosing which MPC DO NOT listen to anyone else until you've decided what you actually need in your studio and what your workflow is. You'll hear plenty of people tell you to get a 3000 or even a 60 because of the SOUND but really when it comes down to processing your tracks using compressors, using EQ, mixdown it will be very hard to tell which fukin MPC was used in a track. It's all a myth....
User avatar

By respect_mbs Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:00 am
Infinitarchitect wrote:You'll hear plenty of people tell you to get a 3000 or even a 60 because of the SOUND but really when it comes down to processing your tracks using compressors, using EQ, mixdown it will be very hard to tell which fukin MPC was used in a track. It's all a myth....


Yes...do yourself a favor and look into newer MPC's (2500/1000/4000). You buy a 60/3000 your paying for prestige/hype. Alot more can be done with the newer samplers and less hassle involved.

By marino Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:26 am
big up to all the real people with real answers for the community 1 8)
User avatar

By Macaiah Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:59 am
WOW!!! i remember when this forum was full of great info. the first time i visited this sight in 2003 i was blown away by the knowledge that everyone posessed.

those were the days when bickering was minimal and everyone pretty much got along.......


.....look how things have changed!!!


with that out of the way....i would def. keep my 2000xl because it was the last MPC that was geared towards making music and not seeing how many useless functions you can stuff in a sequencer/sampler. not under-developed but not packed with so many features that the manual could crush a small child.