Forum to discuss all matters relating to the MPC1000 and MPC2500 operating systems created by 'JJ' (all versions).
User avatar

By alien_brain Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:08 pm
well **** at least it has the ******* 16 pads. ****!!!! **************************!!!!!! ***********************************!!!!!!

would seem oddly suited to such a task.

By 4ndr01d Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:48 am
sorry but if you don't want to use xOx sequencing then don't use it

but don't hold the rest of us back that do!

it would be a great feature on the MPC


if it is implemented, who knows, you might like it!!
User avatar

By gunmetal Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:43 am
hey! aint nothin wrong with more ammuniton for the war! bring it on jj!!! you never know when you need that stiff yet fast snare roll!!! :lol:


tiktiktiktiktiktiktiktiktiktikkitkkitktitkttiikdodododobapbapbapbapbipbipbipbip!





:wink:
User avatar

By M02 Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:54 am
Yeah at first I thought this was a great idea, but then when I thought about it, it really is superfluous.
When you think about it, isn't grid edit just like an X0X sequencer with mutiple tracks displayed at the same time? It just depend how you use it, if you want to view it as an event edito after you've done live sequencing, or if you wanna sequence in there from scratch.
User avatar

By alien_brain Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:57 am
no in fact it isnt the same thing whatsoever.

wheres your immediate interface? can you reach up and touch one button to add/remove an event?

nice try.
User avatar

By M02 Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:11 am
Whoa so defensive! I was just stating my point of view.
You are right, it take in total 5 buttons. The 4 arrow buttons, plus the pad to insert the note. Oh wait, then there's the overdub button, you gotta have that on. And I suppose you are gonna need to use all 16 pads at some stage, so thats 22 buttons.

Oh but hang on, you're also gonna need the mode button to get into the screen, and i'm also guessing the power button. And shit, you might even have to adjust the volume knob while you're at it.
Damn I lost count.
Why do they make these stupid things with so many buttons anyway
User avatar

By M02 Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:21 am
Excuse my sarcasm. My main point is, I agree with the people who think focusing on streamlining the current features would be more beneficial than adding more. Just thought i'd present my side to the argument.
User avatar

By alien_brain Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:22 am
oh well i agree with you there. but you didnt say that.

By 4ndr01d Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:00 am
I'm all for streamlining

but we are all beta testing and bug spotting


I'm also all for new features, no matter what they are

imagine if someone had said grid edit was lame

and it was never implemented...


that would suck!

let's not hold back the future
User avatar

By alien_brain Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:31 am
ROCK the FUTURE i always say ewld chap, yes!
User avatar

By alien_brain Tue Feb 20, 2007 2:37 pm
yeah nice.

im getting a doepfer schaltwerk i think... if i can get the guy to email me back.

Image
User avatar
By arebee Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:11 pm
hey u lot,dont knock it..... its a good idea really, if at all possible ,im all for rounding this jjos into a solid stable mpc utopia - but it cant harm to discuss newies......


i think it would b nice to have the 16 pads represent the 16 steps in an 808 style.
so for those that think it wouldnt be mpc-like, or too different from the grid edit, true to a point but the xox style would be similair in its grid appearance.

different but only because the step thats entered does so at the time where the timeline/cursor is. classic x0x style has the 16 steps arranged so it dont matter where the 'play-head' is, the first pad would always enter a on/off event at the first 16th, and so on for all steps up to pad16 that is the last 16th.

i grew up on a tr606 and a delay unit, yeah 80's crew : ) and i got the most delicate intricate stuf goin, slo, fast, rolls at different tempo's make for a very earcatching and ORIGINAL stuff, even from those 16 lil steps! a bit of 3way level/velocity, carefull volume settings and a few doublespeed or triplets go hell of a long way...

..and nym, its not sleeping ata all in my expeirence, its a truly cerebral activity, infact more so than just whacking away at a skin! ;) i say its more futuristic the xox way - sorry to be contrary in this regard, but all this digital-tech-development has often only served to make electronic music more real-sounding, when its using ssoooo much manhours in r&d,
when people can still FEEL what u r doing on such a relatively simple machine (c)1985.!

its all there, its a matter of how u approach it like nyms sayin,
it could be very fast way of doing v creative rhythms.