Forum to discuss all matters relating to the MPC1000 and MPC2500 operating systems created by 'JJ' (all versions).
User avatar
By primebeatz Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:47 pm
I have had the MPC 1000 since about a week after Guitar Center first got them. I was using the Akai OS until November and had NO SAVE PROBLEMS WHATSOEVER. I use my MPC daily for about two hours. I have NEVER HAD ANY PAD PROBLEMS. Maybe I am just lucky, but I thought I would just put that out there.
User avatar

By es-k Mon Mar 05, 2007 8:30 pm
i havnt had any save problems either.. but the JJOS still is 100000X better than the AKAI OS.. but thats just me :) you can skip out on it if you want
User avatar

By primebeatz Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:08 pm
I bought the jjos this year after using 3.06 for a minute. I'm just saying I've been lucky. JJ is the shit.
User avatar

By Antonym Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:43 pm
VERY lucky, the both of you
ask around - some of us have lost a lot of work.
User avatar

By gunmetal Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:27 pm
primebeatz wrote:I bought the jjos this year after using 3.06 for a minute. I'm just saying I've been lucky. JJ is the ****.






yes, you are lucky indeed!
User avatar

By >DiGiT< Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:23 pm
you must not be pounding on your pads like some idiots
User avatar

By Antonym Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:41 pm
"pounding on the pads" has nothing to do with pads being broken.
"regular use" is enough to break mpc1000 pads due to akai's flawed, halfassed design.

it's not a generation of heavy handed samplists.
User avatar

By >DiGiT< Tue Mar 06, 2007 6:54 pm
really?

why havent mine broken with regular use?

not doubting you, just curious. i still want a set of your fixed ones.
User avatar

By Hamzter Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:07 pm
I hope that I don't run into HW or SW problems with the MPC.

I only had it for a month now, but only an hour a week average... But I know when classes are over for this semester I will be putting at least a couple of hours a day on it...
User avatar

By Antonym Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:20 pm
>DiGiT< wrote:why havent mine broken with regular use?


when did you get yours?
my theory is that roger eventoff, creator of the original interlink electronics FSR, has been hired to redo the original MPC 1000 pads. i figured this from talking to him on the phone about a month back. same technology, but apparently a little more durable. however, even these seem to be breaking for other people after extended use.

the mpc pads are/were/have been structured like this:

Image
Image

the latter was held above (not touching) the former by 4 pinhead sized dots of silicone glue. pinhead, like the guy who designed this sensor.

when the pads were triggered, the rubber would be bent down toward the active copper area. this stressed both the rubber and the silicone glue. eventually, the rubber would "slough" and a thin streak of it would come off on the silicone, which would stay attached to the fiberglass sensor. the rubber would come loose and float around the pad. and the pad would be broken.

the 4 dots of glue were simply not enough to hold all the moving parts together. AWFUL idea, AWFUL implementation, and AWFUL manufacturing.
User avatar

By >DiGiT< Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:40 pm
ok i believe you. ill be awaiting your solution eagerly...
User avatar

By primebeatz Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:45 pm
Antonym wrote:
>DiGiT< wrote:why havent mine broken with regular use?


when did you get yours?
my theory is that roger eventoff, creator of the original interlink electronics FSR, has been hired to redo the original MPC 1000 pads. i figured this from talking to him on the phone about a month back. same technology, but apparently a little more durable. however, even these seem to be breaking for other people after extended use.

the mpc pads are/were/have been structured like this:

Image
Image

the latter was held above (not touching) the former by 4 pinhead sized dots of silicone glue. pinhead, like the guy who designed this sensor.

when the pads were triggered, the rubber would be bent down toward the active copper area. this stressed both the rubber and the silicone glue. eventually, the rubber would "slough" and a thin streak of it would come off on the silicone, which would stay attached to the fiberglass sensor. the rubber would come loose and float around the pad. and the pad would be broken.

the 4 dots of glue were simply not enough to hold all the moving parts together. AWFUL idea, AWFUL implementation, and AWFUL manufacturing.



So could we be proactive and put more glue on it before the pads messed up?
User avatar

By gunmetal Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:57 pm
>DiGiT< wrote:you must not be pounding on your pads like some idiots




so sayeth the cookie monster.
User avatar

By >DiGiT< Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:03 pm
COOOOOOOKIIIIEEE!!!!
User avatar

By wavemartian Tue Mar 06, 2007 11:47 pm
Coming up to 1 year anniversary i've just realised that pad 2 is becoming a bit unresponsive. Time to get out the double sided conductive carbon adhesive tape. I can get a truck load of this stuff they use to stick down biological samples