For discussion about setting up your studio and advice on the gear and equipment within it.
User avatar
By vakseen Mon Apr 12, 2004 1:19 am
This may sound like a silly question but, I was wondering does the cpu recording program that u use (brand name) to record and mix affect the resulting sound quality??? Ie. I currently use a pro audio cakewalk program. Would, say, cubase, protools or whatever affect my final product. I personally like my current program. It has all the typical features, unlimited tracks and a bunch of plug ins. On top of that, everything sounds good. Just want to make sure I'm doing what's best for my music. I definitely need some different opinions on this. Any feedback is highly appreciated!

By elmacaco Mon Apr 12, 2004 1:44 am
Don't worry about it, if it works and you like it, there is no need to change, they all do pretty much the same thing.
User avatar

By Ron Mon Apr 12, 2004 1:50 am
What version of cakewalk do you use? I like their Sonar 2 and 3 versions.

By LabWorkz Mon Apr 12, 2004 2:38 am
True they all do pretty much the same like elmacaco stated but I like protools the best tho! 8) Try the digi 002 rack out it's nice mos def! :wink:
User avatar

By vakseen Mon Apr 12, 2004 6:01 am
So u guys are saying there definitely is NO difference in the programs? That's a good thing to hear. Just wanted to make sure, program wise, I have nothing holding me back. I'm still fairly new to the engineering side of things. But, the beautiful thing is learning new skills each and every day. I definitely love having unlimited tracks though. That's where a lot of other programs lose my vote. One of my artists was saying I should use protools cause its the standard, and it gives a diff sound. I understand that but, I'm def no follower "just cause". My current prog is tight though. Just had to make sure "if it aint broke, don't fix it" applied in my case. Thanks for the feed back! If anyone else has opinion, let it be known. Far as ur question Ron, I'm using home studio pro 2004 (far as I've seen same as sonar). I see u do your thing. Have any tips on mixing??
By jacksk Tue Apr 13, 2004 12:04 am
Vakseen,

So im thinking about getting Cakewalk home studio pro 2004. I have a very simple setup. MPC 2000XL w/sound effects but no 8outs. A good pc that could handle recording i believe...anyway what else would I need in order to get cakewalk?


thanks
User avatar

By vakseen Tue Apr 13, 2004 1:48 am
True. Its a tight program. Far as ur question, depends on what u plan to do, record ur beats or record beats and vocals. Personally, I'm currently using a tascam us-122. Its an audio/midi interface. This will allow you to record from different inputs (mpc, mics, synth, midi, etc...). It def gets the job done for me! Only thing now is I want to have more inputs so I can record beats with the 8outs. Now I have to solo each track to mix my beats, which is cool, just takes longer. Anything I've seen on the market with more inputs is running over $1000. Just trying to find out if that's necessary. I put up a post asking for peoples input but didn't really get any responses. Hopefully this helps u. I have a very simple setup but it def does more than get the job done!! Peace
User avatar

By Ron Tue Apr 13, 2004 4:03 am
If you watch what you are doing your 122 will produce very good results. As far as software gose. Well the truth is your taste. You will eventually find one you like. At that point. The tools are only as good as the one ussing them.
User avatar

By Decepticon3107 Tue Apr 13, 2004 4:23 am
Software is just a bunch of binary code, it has no effect on the sound quality. Its the HARDware that you use that will have an adverse effect on it (crappy soundcard = crappy audio quality). That Tascam joint is nice, though, you shouldnt have any complaints...
User avatar

By vakseen Wed Apr 14, 2004 3:55 am
I can definitely amen that! I've had amazing results with my set up. Of course it helps we have serious talent too lol. But I highly appreciate u guys lending your say and clearing that up for me.