Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs
By MalcOverflow Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:27 am
I purchased a mpc2500 a few weeks ago becauce of its ADVANCED features. In not so many words lets just say im back on the 3000 and theres no way in hell im ever switchin to another beat machine. There really is a difference in the sound quality of the samplers....dont let any one tell you different. This 3 is the best there is.......

Peace

Overflow

By deegood Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:21 am
Is it worth $1400? I saw a nice one on ebay. I've been watching them for a while and it seems like that's cool for a real nice one. I really want the le but they bust heads for those. I might get it soon!

//

By firework Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:57 pm
What was the problem with the mpc 2500 bro? If it was sound you could of just bought a 12 bit sampler for that warm sound. When i had a mpc 2kxl i hated the sound, HATED!!! so i sampled everthing with my eps-m or emax and just sequenced with the xl...the only thing i hated more was the sound and weak swing of reason, i will never make beats with PC's//// NEVER!
User avatar

By ReckOne Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:43 pm
The sound of the 3000 is better than that of the 2000(xl) although both are 16 bit.

By deegood Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:50 pm
Does the pads feel better or the same? I had a 4k and the pads were wayyy better than the 1k or 2kxl.
User avatar

By ReckOne Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:23 pm
Dunno, but the pads on my 60 are WAY nicer than on my xl aswell...Not to mention the 1000.

By MalcOverflow Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:23 pm
fobedafied wrote::lol:


thought you woulda known better... :lol:


I know.....I know. Shame on me. I got gear lust. There is no comparison. I know that now.

By macman Sun Jul 29, 2007 9:36 pm
I switch to the 2500 about 6 months ago now and would never go back. Yeah the 3k has a hard sound but by the time i run the kik/snr through the API the shit bangs the same.

The work flow is so fast on the 2500 and the features give me new idea's i could never do on the 3k


Move 2 the future

//

By firework Mon Jul 30, 2007 5:38 am
macman, are you not concerned with the cheap build and quality of the 2500/1000 - I know people complain about the pad going to hell after usage on the 1000 and folk complain about the cheap toggle wheel going to hell on the 2500....is te sound on the 2500 thin like on the 2kxl?
User avatar
By deck daddy Mon Jul 30, 2007 9:16 am
I made a beat on the 2500 together with the owner of it, and yo, I did not like it.

You could set different envelopes on samples you assign just like on the 3000, but when i tried to layer some kicks the way I do on the 3000 it got all wack with no punch at all. The envelope on the pad that I chose to trigger to other samples with was the "master" envelope or something, so the other envelopes followed that one. Man, I hated that.

The data wheel felt like cheap plastic, and not like something that will last 10 years.

And the sound was not incredible at all, neither was the subfilter, (not even close to 3000's) compressor or other effects. The filters was nothing, a nobody, sounded terrible.
User avatar
By ReckOne Mon Jul 30, 2007 12:49 pm
firework wrote:....is te sound on the 2500 thin like on the 2kxl?


Do you really think the sound on the xl is thin? Or thin in comparison to a 3000?

By Alphasatori Mon Jul 30, 2007 2:16 pm
Does the 2500 not use the same DSP chip as the 2000/3000 ?

As for the data wheel, yeah i agree that bugs the crap out of me