4.80 is here ...

Here ya go fellaz.
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/%7Empc1000/mpc1000_nv480.bin

----------------------------------------------
Bug fix & Change: New OS Ver4.80 09-Aug-2007
----------------------------------------------
[TRACK MUTE]

< Information >　
　Since OS memory was insufficient, "Next sequence play mode window" of the addition to MPC2500
　 was not able to be added to MPC1000.

Too bad, requested this as i need it badly for live performances

so, still no real time qlink control of external input filter,

hmmm

O

does this mean that the mpc 2500 os developement can continue further?
i'll watch for the improvements carefully...and then perhaps i'll upgrade if i see something (really) interesting...

[quote]<Change cursor key behavior.>
[TRIM]

rinseout wrote:

< Information >　
　Since OS memory was insufficient, "Next sequence play mode window" of the addition to MPC2500
　 was not able to be added to MPC1000.

Too bad, requested this as i need it badly for live performances

what is it doing?

Andrizzle wrote:[TRIM]
If cursor DOWN key is pushed when [Sample neme] is a highlight,
it will move to [St:00000000]. If cursor LEFT key is pushed when [St:00000000] is a highlight,it will move to [Sample name].

The best possible solution for this problem. Easy to handle and very intuitive! You did it agian JJ!

Allows "immediately play/start" in next seq mode i think.

[quote="Andrizzle"]TRACK MUTE]

potential 4.8 bug:

1 - load old project with multiple tracks
2 - mute all tracks
3 - hit play
4 - view VOICE MONITOR
5 - though all tracks are muted, phantom notes are being played and costing polyphony.

shit that sounds like a major feature to me, for those of you performing live using track mutes and the next seq function are your bread and butter tools, I honestly would look to see what else could be dropped instead of something major like that, from the looks of it it looks like even jj is sad about that one.

stale bread wrote: I honestly would look to see what else could be dropped instead of something major like that,...

Me too. That feature is truly needed. If we can all just agree on something that needs to go we can get it.

ahem
old program mode

Antonym wrote:ahem
old program mode

+1

I say ditch the pitch shifter for the input, I'm guessing about .000000000001% of the people who use the JJ OS actually use that pitch shifter.

Otherwise, yeah, old program mode can go, too...