Can't decide which MPC to choose? Read these resources or post your questions here.
By apricotandpearjam Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:41 pm
Hi. I use an MPC 2000XL to create all of my music and i need to go onstage with my album. I need more than 32mb of ram but i dont like the feel of the new mpcs. The feel of it and the pads mean a lot to me. I need to find a workaround to go onstage with.

How does the 2000XL compare to the 4000? I see that the 4000 can be expanded up to 512MB ram.

If anyone could offer any advice id really appreciate it.

Thanks, Ben
User avatar
By dabmeister Tue Sep 18, 2007 9:43 pm
apricotandpearjam wrote:Hi. I use an MPC 2000XL to create all of my music and i need to go onstage with my album. I need more than 32mb of ram but i dont like the feel of the new mpcs. The feel of it and the pads mean a lot to me. I need to find a workaround to go onstage with.

How does the 2000XL compare to the 4000? I see that the 4000 can be expanded up to 512MB ram.

If anyone could offer any advice id really appreciate it.

Thanks, Ben
Come on son, you can do better than that. The 2kXL will run rings around the 4k, plus some. Don't let the large amount of memory fool ya, the smaller-the better. What else do you need to know?
User avatar

By konc3pt Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:38 pm
most of the time at concerts I see mpc 1000 being used live on stage, or 2000xl and 1000 combo.
User avatar
By Grouphome Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:30 am
dabmeister wrote:
apricotandpearjam wrote:Hi. I use an MPC 2000XL to create all of my music and i need to go onstage with my album. I need more than 32mb of ram but i dont like the feel of the new mpcs. The feel of it and the pads mean a lot to me. I need to find a workaround to go onstage with.

How does the 2000XL compare to the 4000? I see that the 4000 can be expanded up to 512MB ram.

If anyone could offer any advice id really appreciate it.

Thanks, Ben
Come on son, you can do better than that. The 2kXL will run rings around the 4k, plus some. Don't let the large amount of memory fool ya, the smaller-the better. What else do you need to know?
think you've been smokin crack

the 4k is a beast, steady, fast to use and wont crash on you.
depending on how many samples and how many tracks/songs how much ram you really need, if you know that, then it will be easier for you to decide.
If you can put your whole set in the memory of the 2kxl than go for that, you allready know that machine, If you can live with loading times while loading a new track (cause mem was full), you can also go for the 2kxl.
If you can live with 128 mb ram than you can go for the 1000.
User avatar

By dabmeister Wed Sep 19, 2007 1:15 pm
ImageThat was intended to be a joke dawg. However, I do get a laugh out of the responses made from such statements. Guess why I've got a 4k? :mrgreen:
User avatar

By Grouphome Wed Sep 19, 2007 3:47 pm
I've been in defencive mode the last day.
Can't help it :lol: own them both and love em both
User avatar

By dabmeister Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:59 pm
Grouphome wrote:I've been in defensive mode the last day.
Can't help it :lol: own them both and love 'em both
:lol: It's all good.

By apricotandpearjam Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:26 pm
konc3pt wrote:most of the time at concerts I see mpc 1000 being used live on stage, or 2000xl and 1000 combo.


Hi. What do you mean bu this? 2000xl and 1000 combo???

Thanks, Ben

By apricotandpearjam Sun Sep 23, 2007 12:51 pm
Hi, The 2000xl 1000 combo sounds interesting. Can anyone tell me more about it?

Has anyone got any advice on loading new sequences and pgms whilst on stage with only 23mb ram.

Thanks again . . . your advice is so useful to me. Thanks, Ben

By carmel Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:04 am
resample on 22 khz
the 32 megs will be enough :D

By carmel Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:27 am
You can choose between the mono-stereo stereo-mono convert and the resampling (as far as I remember shift trim open window and somewhere there) and there you can "resample" at different frequency and bit resolution. The only bad thing is the 2000 XL processes it too slow. But the result is a nice sound (samples on 22 khz are just like came from an sp or some old sampler). In my live setup I always did the same thing when I had longer samples. The other thing which is useful I think you don't really need stereo samples in a venue; no one will say this live set wasn't wide enough :D
So with mainly mono samples and some samples on a lower rate the 32 megs should be enough I think.

By apricotandpearjam Tue Oct 16, 2007 10:15 am
Ok. Nice. Thanks. Is there any mac applications that would be able to resample to 22KHz? Or is it best to do it on the MPC, so its sounds nicer? Thanks, Ben