swift_-' wrote:u cant really put 2000xl with 3000 or 60's because 2kxl only costs used 400-500, 3000 go for about 1,200 and the 60s go for 800-1000. so yes they are better mpcs because they always have been the more expensive, 2kxl really works for the common person.
KkonEl wrote:swift_-' wrote:u cant really put 2000xl with 3000 or 60's because 2kxl only costs used 400-500, 3000 go for about 1,200 and the 60s go for 800-1000. so yes they are better mpcs because they always have been the more expensive, 2kxl really works for the common person.
That's probably on of the dumbest things I've ever heard
and I say that being an owner of a 3oooLE
eastcoast121 wrote:i would think the only reason the 3000 is the best mpc is becuz its the best one that is a 12 bit sampler.
xabiton wrote:eastcoast121 wrote:i would think the only reason the 3000 is the best mpc is becuz its the best one that is a 12 bit sampler.
but its 16 bit lol. the only 12 bit mpc is the 60 lol
Lampdog wrote:xabiton wrote:eastcoast121 wrote:i would think the only reason the 3000 is the best mpc is becuz its the best one that is a 12 bit sampler.
but its 16 bit lol. the only 12 bit mpc is the 60 lol
LOL
DJ Supreme wrote:I love my mpc3000le but as far as king that would be the 4000. It does everything you need to get the job done
