Discuss the various methods you use in music production, from compressor settings to equipment type.
User avatar
By scizz Wed May 26, 2004 11:49 am
first i want to tell u ppl that im GLAD this forum exists, u know, it saves us producers so much time. i've been lately experimenting with recording techniques and have been wondering about a few thngs i like to ask u guys. and came to certain conclusions id like to share. here it goes:
first let me say that i make beats on the 4k and record on roland vs2400cd:

1_i noticed that its much better to have a hot mix averagely compressed and eq'd before recording cos if everything's recorded flat out the mpc and mic its a pain in the ass to mix and then master to a pro level volume.

2_i'm running the mic (nt1-A) thru a mackie dfx-6 mixer(as a pre-amp) then gate(berhinger) then compressor and then limiter (tc-electroic m-one) and finally into the multitrack using the buit in pre-amp, the mpc outs are connected directly to the recorder.(btw the beat is partially compressed in the mpc)

3_ PROBLEM: the mic sounds better but i spend 2 hours adjusting the dynamics of the mic for each mc (we're 3) and that's for each beat.and the mic compression is not right yet.

4_QUESTION: am i doing something wrong by adding: GATE-COMPRESSOR-LIMITER on the mic in this order (let me remind u im a perfectionist and i like the mic sounding just right when recording, each mc has to be right where he's suppose to in the beat)

5_the turntablist: what to add on the tables for dynamics when recording i got the vestax pmc5 pro 3 mixer but i think its better to compress the cutz using a rack. am i wrong? if not should i add anything else?

thanx in advance for any replies.

peace

By Dos Wed May 26, 2004 2:00 pm
scizz wrote:1_i noticed that its much better to have a hot mix averagely compressed and eq'd before recording cos if everything's recorded flat out the mpc and mic its a pain in the **** to mix and then master to a pro level volume.
[code]

OK, no offense but there's no such thing as a 'pro level'. I do know what you mean, but this is really a mastering issue, worry about your mix first. Some engineers like to mix with a comp or limiter across the mix bus to give an idea of what the master will sound like but unless you are very experienced this is not advisable. If your track isn't loud enough when listening back, I'm not trying be smart, but turn up the volume. Preserve the tracks dynamics until mastering and as hard as it maybe for you to do give the mix to someone experienced in mastering to master it.


scizz wrote:2_i'm running the mic (nt1-A) thru a mackie dfx-6 mixer(as a pre-amp) then gate(berhinger) then compressor and then limiter (tc-electroic m-one) and finally into the multitrack using the buit in pre-amp, the mpc outs are connected directly to the recorder.(btw the beat is partially compressed in the mpc)
[code]

What MPC do you have, 4000?
You say you are running the mic signal through the mackie pre and finally through the mutitracks pre. This is an unnecessary gain stage which adds more noise to your signal, although this may sound nice and be what you want. If not, I would advise listening to the mic with the same vocalist in the same room thruogh both pre amps and see which one you prefer. It may be quite hard to hear diferences in pre amps and generally you'll have to train your ears, this is just practice. Decent/unflattering monitoring helps alot aswell.
As for the gate, berhinger, in my experience tend to produce quite noisey products, personally I avoid putting any audio through behringer gear. You may find better results from manually cutting the silences from the vocals in your mutli track. If you listen to the output of your berhiger gate, with the volume cranked up, and compare it to the TC electronic compressor you should see what I mean. (I'm just guessing here, I don't know either piece of gear but generally TC electronic are of a better build quality.

scizz wrote:3_ PROBLEM: the mic sounds better but i spend 2 hours adjusting the dynamics of the mic for each mc (we're 3) and that's for each beat.and the mic compression is not right yet.
[code]

Think about what you are trying to do with the compressor. At the recording stage you just want to eliminate and large peaks that the vocalist may have so that you don't have to turndown your input gain just for a couple of words in the track. Be very careful when recording with compression as you can't undo it. You can always go back later and compress more. Spending two hours setting the compressor before you record you run the risk of tiring the vocalist and the initial enthusasim for the track is gone. When some one come to you to record and they're in 'a zone' or whatever, you need to be able to capture that. Spaend two hours setting a compressor can be very tediuos for those waiting and in my experience I'd rather capture a really sweet performance then a really nice sounding mediocre one. Think about the records you love, why do you love them, the sound quality?? Perhaps, but for me it's the energy, the emotion. I worry about capturing that first and foremost.
Actually there's a perfect example of this on my soundclick below, I've just discovered soundclick so there's only one tune on there (this is an unfinished mix) but I'm not at all happy with the vocal sound on this, it was recorded two years ago through a Neumann U87, into a Tascam 2424 using Audient pre amps, this was good, then it was bounced in to protools via an analog connection from the Tascam, then bounced to 16bit, burned to CD and sampled into a Roland SP808 just to mess around with also along the way it was badly compressed and distorted!!!. When we finally came to mix the track, we realised we'd lost the original mutitrack DVD!! No problem, we'll record it again, at this point i'd learned a lot more about recording and was able to get an even sweeter sound from the U87 through a Focusrite 440 pre amp and also working with the MC for a long time I've realised that placing the mic slightly lower than mouth level gave a more chesty sound (this is a nice trick for lessening an 'essy' vocalists esses. Or similarly if you want a more nasal sound raise the mic a little) Anyway, the MC just couldn't give the same performance as the original, we just couldn't get it as good or better, sure the sound quality was much better but fck that, we used the original even though it was fcked. I did my best to try to restore some dynamics and quality but of course this isn't as pure as getting right from the mic.
What mic are you usingand where are you recording(type and size of room) ?

scizz wrote:4_QUESTION: am i doing something wrong by adding: GATE-COMPRESSOR-LIMITER on the mic in this order (let me remind u im a perfectionist and i like the mic sounding just right when recording, each mc has to be right where he's suppose to in the beat)
[code]

This is a really good approach, to get it sounding right for the mix when you are recording, so many people don't do this, they just record and say we'll fix it later. However, using a compressor and a limiter might be a bit overkill, again you are introuducing another possible noise source for no apparent reason. Think about what you need to do with the vocal and compression, do you really need a limiter? If so, I'd personally do it later, sounds pretty excessive, turn the beat down if the vocals aren't loud enough and you can spend more time focusing on it later. Try to perserve some of the dynamics of the vocal, this is especcially important in Hip Hop as so many vocals are very straight and not very dynamic anyway.

scizz wrote:5_the turntablist: what to add on the tables for dynamics when recording i got the vestax pmc5 pro 3 mixer but i think its better to compress the cutz using a rack. am i wrong? if not should i add anything else?
[code]

Your limiter should work well on the cuts, just to shear those spiky peaks a bit and not to ruin the dynamics. Although, personally I compress the sht out of cuts to give them that in your face feel, this is a preference thing. Mess around and see what you like.
Anyway hope i was of some help, let me know how you get on,
Peace,
Dos
User avatar

By scizz Thu May 27, 2004 6:15 am
yo Dos, much love + respect for the help, i need it.
my man i wish it was possible for me to make u listen to my stuff but its not, im using the internet from my daytime job, at night i go underground(litterally) in the studio where i got no connection + uknow how it is with ppl and their unfinished material. but anyway here's the deal:

1- the only reason why im compressing & equing everything (minor gain and tweaks) is for the track to be enjoyable when recording and the tc electronic compressor gives more noise than the behringer and the gate on it sucks im using it as a comp+limiter (dual engine)

2- im totally with u on the lyrix' energy and mc's enbthusiasm im an mc myself and i know what the difference is between the first and second time u spit ur rhyme. but man im thinking ill spend the time adjusting everything one day and record the next. cos we're not 18 year old mc's. we cant spit on some flat beat with ur voice floating on it like an evacuation alarm.

3- i got the mpc 4000 and rode NT1-A mic, and the reason why im using both pre's is cos i found the combination to be the best choice. im using the multitrack pre very lightly and mackie is a mixer and when i use it alone and boost the gain its distorting. maybe i should get a tube pre but im out of cash at the moment (i got the mic volume on -10db and negative gain, so im kind of compressing the mic in the mixer as well)

4- im recording in a room i designed a year ago, which i would have done a bit differently if it was now but its still ok , its a basement room(3m x 4m, height 2.5m) double layered wood walls with inside walls covered with foam insulation (the type with peaks and valley's ), basically the whole studio is a big recording booth. im not worried about the room the sound is crystal clear.

5- ill try ur tip on the cuts makes a lot of sense. and about letting someone else master my sht. i dont know man, this is lebanon and i dont trust their ears.

ur right about running the mic thru all these units and noise ill try different things this weekend and let u know asap. btw, im using the multitrack pre's on the mpc outs as well is that a wise thing to do ?
anyway tnx again and i'll let u know if i have anymore questions
peace




[/quote]
User avatar

By sensewondah Thu May 27, 2004 7:48 pm
i like 3 sets of ears when im finishing a track.

mine when creating the entire thing, my engineers along with mine for the mixdown, and then finally a mastering engineer.

By Toecutter Thu May 27, 2004 8:33 pm
I was wondering what was the probelm coordinating the three different emcees on the track, if everyone is standing the proper distance from the mic and projecting their voice properly, you should be able to get a good sound of everyone on the track separately with just making minor adjustments to the mic level without having to throw tons of compression on it (I know you don't use tons, I'm giving a gross exaggeration to make a point). Are they even rehearsing their verses prior to going in and recording it or are they writing it and laying it down spontanneously on the spot? A little pre production and rehearsal never hurt anyone. Let me know if any of this relates to your situation.
User avatar

By scizz Fri May 28, 2004 7:27 am
Toecutter, im not recording all 3 mc's with one take, that'll be impossible to mix later in the multitrack(using only one mic). we are recording one at a time but each voice has certain characteristics so different settings on the gate, comp, limiter and eq. and the only problem is the setup and workin process in recording. im not even worried about us mcs as far as rhyming and being on point. its the setup! its engineering the voices for each song before recording.
i know its risky cos once recorded u cant go back but if the recording is tight then after mixing and mastering im assuming the track will sound like a blizzard (again only talking about sound quality, not worried about content and delivery). i dont like playing it safe, i dont believe in it (in life even). just need to know if anything is missing (equipment or knowledge or know-how). tnx again ppl and feel free to help,comment, criticise or whatever.
peace

By Dos Fri May 28, 2004 2:23 pm
scizz wrote:ur right about running the mic thru all these units and noise ill try different things this weekend and let u know asap. btw, im using the multitrack pre's on the mpc outs as well is that a wise thing to do ?
anyway tnx again and i'll let u know if i have anymore questions
peace
[/quote]

Hey Scizz, whats up?
Why you running the MPC through the pre, the MPC outputs at line level. Are you sure you're not just putting it through the line ins. Of course you may like the sound if you're going through another pre but becareful not to kill the pre with too much signal. Remember, analog sound is trasmitted as a voltage, the pre is design to amplify mic level voltages which are significantly lower than line level. But fck it if it sounds good then let's fry some pre's.
You should check out a book by Bob Katz called 'Mastering Audio' it''l blow you away. It's mainly about mastering but you'll learn something on every page, that guy is a genius.
What the Hip Hop like in the Lebanon? You got to post some sht I'd like to hear it.

Peace
User avatar

By scizz Sat May 29, 2004 8:49 am
yo Dos, i got the line outs of the mpc going into the line-ins on the recorder, but im adding gain (like on a regular mixer pre, ofcourse with no phantom power).
man ull hear our sht soon (Takavoragan), we're working on a website (a link in our dj's site: djlethalskillz.com), and definitely posting our music there, but its happening u know, its looking good. how's sht in Ireland? the REAL music scene here is not that big, but we're working on it, and hopefully it'll change if its God's will.

ps: got an old track posted on: http://stage.vitaminic.co.uk/main/takavoragan
(low quality mp3, beat made on reason, song mixed on nuendo: cant even be compared to the new sht, even the lyx, but check it out anyway)
peace

By Dos Sun May 30, 2004 3:03 am
Track is real nice man, let me know when you get the new stuff up, I look forward to hearing it
Peace
User avatar

By scizz Mon May 31, 2004 11:11 am
tnx man, glad u like it. i'll let u know when we get the site runnin