By dtaa pla muk
Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:33 pm
i knew it was there and i knew it was a nice, powerful function
but last night i finally found a spot in one of my beats where it sounded good.
i used it on the SYNTAR inst pgm from the KURZWEIL k2000vp.
i turned the attack up a little, put the filter/res up to taste, then put aftertouch at a fairly extreme value, +60.
i already had the majority of the beat's menlody programmed (by the way, dirtybird, this is for YOU holmes!!!!! brand new, DARK as hell) but it needed more subtle tonal additions
so first i added an out and out low synth growl on beginning of my seq. it was fairly easy to do: the trouble is to hit the pad very very soft, yet still at the right time. you start w/ your finger already on the pad and then gently press down when it's time...like i said, hard to get right. then, when you DO get it right, you have to fluctuate your pressure to make a sympathetic sweeping (or in this case) growling sound as the filter opens/closes depending on your pressure.
i then moved to the next track for more synth work. i copied the sYnTAR pgm and used the copy for this new track. changed a couple params, largely the depth/growl of the filter, and a couple lfo settings to make it warble. this new sound was much smoother and more gentle. plus, since it uses higher pitched samples in the inst pgm, i may change their sampling rate to 11025 independently of the louder growl sample. anyway, i brushed in some of these at complementary parts of some of my beat, performing a quiet, aftertouchy inversion of a guitar in my lead sample...
now, aftertouch is no new function, and certainly some other machines use it better. however it's new to me, and a great deal of fun. my only beef is that it doesn't seem like AFTERTOUCH is per PAD, but rather per TRACK. also, am i tripping or do you record CHANNEL PRESSURE in MIDI tracks and AFTERTOUCH in DRUM tracks?
but last night i finally found a spot in one of my beats where it sounded good.
i used it on the SYNTAR inst pgm from the KURZWEIL k2000vp.
i turned the attack up a little, put the filter/res up to taste, then put aftertouch at a fairly extreme value, +60.
i already had the majority of the beat's menlody programmed (by the way, dirtybird, this is for YOU holmes!!!!! brand new, DARK as hell) but it needed more subtle tonal additions
so first i added an out and out low synth growl on beginning of my seq. it was fairly easy to do: the trouble is to hit the pad very very soft, yet still at the right time. you start w/ your finger already on the pad and then gently press down when it's time...like i said, hard to get right. then, when you DO get it right, you have to fluctuate your pressure to make a sympathetic sweeping (or in this case) growling sound as the filter opens/closes depending on your pressure.
i then moved to the next track for more synth work. i copied the sYnTAR pgm and used the copy for this new track. changed a couple params, largely the depth/growl of the filter, and a couple lfo settings to make it warble. this new sound was much smoother and more gentle. plus, since it uses higher pitched samples in the inst pgm, i may change their sampling rate to 11025 independently of the louder growl sample. anyway, i brushed in some of these at complementary parts of some of my beat, performing a quiet, aftertouchy inversion of a guitar in my lead sample...
now, aftertouch is no new function, and certainly some other machines use it better. however it's new to me, and a great deal of fun. my only beef is that it doesn't seem like AFTERTOUCH is per PAD, but rather per TRACK. also, am i tripping or do you record CHANNEL PRESSURE in MIDI tracks and AFTERTOUCH in DRUM tracks?




