By scd
Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:12 pm
A correction to the dudes post:
You can easily tune a whole program by assigning a Q link to it.
And synth presets can be loaded from a folder, you are not forced to do that one by one. Autoload works like a charm. The way he describes it isn't real.
His remark about automatically assigning samples when changing pads: good point.
His crash report: he should contact Akai first I should say.
The guy has a few good points, but is also making elephants out of bugs (the small creatures) as we say here in the Netherlands.
And the 4k was MUCH buggier when it came out than the 5k. No doubt.
Yes, you can argue the name 5k, but Akai never advertized the 5k being the successor of the 4k, it was/is advertized as the todays flagship, which it is.
Yes, the OS can be improved, yes there are bugs, but it is much less worse than this guy is suggesting.
And besides that, the OS *will* be improved and bugs *will* be solved. I find his blogpost destructive and unfair.
You can easily tune a whole program by assigning a Q link to it.
And synth presets can be loaded from a folder, you are not forced to do that one by one. Autoload works like a charm. The way he describes it isn't real.
His remark about automatically assigning samples when changing pads: good point.
His crash report: he should contact Akai first I should say.
The guy has a few good points, but is also making elephants out of bugs (the small creatures) as we say here in the Netherlands.
And the 4k was MUCH buggier when it came out than the 5k. No doubt.
Yes, you can argue the name 5k, but Akai never advertized the 5k being the successor of the 4k, it was/is advertized as the todays flagship, which it is.
Yes, the OS can be improved, yes there are bugs, but it is much less worse than this guy is suggesting.
And besides that, the OS *will* be improved and bugs *will* be solved. I find his blogpost destructive and unfair.








