Talk and share knowledge on rare records, sources of new samples, vinyl, diggin, etc

Stanton STR8-150 or Technics SL-1210M5G?

4
24%
13
76%
By namotu Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:58 am
yeah i actually have a pair of T=80's. I'm no DJ, i use em to scratch and sample off of, but occasionally ill mix a song if i find a few cool ones , or got the time. I wanna get better, and your right, the T.80's seem to work fine. I have nothing to compare them too, but for $200 with a cartriadge, you can't bet it. I got there SA.3 mixer too, which is nice.
By zapp Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:27 pm
I don't have the time to read your dissertation there however from what I did read I just want to clarify that I have used Vestax turntables as well as Geminis, Stantons and Numarks. The only one I can possibly think of are the Vestax even though I'm not entirely convinced. Concerning the 1200's I didn't tell him to go buy a used pair that's damaged. I've had mine for about 6 years and only had to repair the pitch once which was a minimal repair. Other than that these turntables I have are about 15 to 20 years old and work extremely well. I personally would highly recommend Technics as well as most people who posted on here.
By bedouin Mon Sep 08, 2008 8:59 am
sammo1987 wrote:Here is a review I found on it.. I plan on buying this but shipping to hawaii is redicious
http://www.skratchworx.com/reviews/tt04.php


Yeah, I was real skeptical at first given Gemini's history, but I've heard nothing but good things about this deck. The thing you have to remember is that many of these decks aren't manufactured by the company who distributes them. Gemini doesn't actually make the PT-04, they just badge it; same thing with the ST-150. In the US it's sold as Stanton; in the UK another company branded it and distributes it. You might have minor design changes, but that's about it.

I haven't seen anything to suggest that Gemini deck is a bad buy -- and that's hard for me to say given the number of crap products I owned by them :) I haven't heard bad things about their hybrid turntable either.
User avatar
By dj e.d.e Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:02 pm
of course them dudes are sponsored by gemini and they have to do there jobs, but gemini has been and always will be entry level equipment,

i've spun on all them and and theres no compareson to tech, platter weight,plater pick up,stop start feature, pitch.

if you have used professional equipment you will see the difference,YOU CAN TELL THE DIFFERENCE IN QUALITY TO SOMETHING YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY MONEY FOR INTHE FUTURE,

I DIDNT START ON TECH 1200'S...BUT IT WAS THE TABLE , IT'S INDUSTRY STANDARDS
User avatar
By BenHoughton Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:57 pm
i'm a bit floored here...

seriously bedouin how can you be so critical of the 1200s? its not the features that we're after, its the feel, the solidness & build quality, the knowledge that every club you walk into is going to have a pair... not to mention resale!!

I mean i'm pretty open minded with these things but in terms of features.. well how many features do you need to mix vinyl? I mean more than 8% is going to sound not that great anyway right? The way i see it, the 1200s are like the benchmark - if you've got the skills, they'll do the job. Other decks might be more forgiving, sure. But at the end of the day, 1200s should allow you to create the mix you want

Ok, i'll say it - i've never gotten down with any other brand decks.

But who needs/wants to anyway?

just my $0.02
By bedouin Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:31 pm
dj e.d.e wrote:i've spun on all them and and theres no compareson to tech, platter weight,plater pick up,stop start feature, pitch.


My first turntables were Gemini XL-BD10s in 1991 or so, maybe 92. They were horrible. My neighbor had XL-DD30s and in some ways, even though they were a 'higher end' model, they were worse than my BD10s. I also owned an XL-DD50II that I used just for ripping vinyl and listening. All of them were major disappointments and only purchased because, as I've said plenty of times, no comparable alternatives existed until the late 90s when the 1200's motor design patent expired.

Around 93 I got 1200s. Kept them until the late 90s when I took a hiatus from DJing. It was a different time back then. Have you used the TT-04s? If not don't comment. They're actually not even made by Gemini . . . .

I've had my share of bad experience with Gemini but being objective means putting aside prejudices.

if you have used professional equipment you will see the difference,YOU CAN TELL THE DIFFERENCE IN QUALITY TO SOMETHING YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY MONEY FOR INTHE FUTURE


Vestax's tables and especially the ST-150s are built equally or better than 1200s. I'd tend to say better since I've seen both disassembled.

IT'S INDUSTRY STANDARDS


That's the worst cop out line ever. It's like saying you can't buy a Nissan because Toyota is the industry standard. If you can't adjust between a 1200 and any other high end deck you should refrain from appearing in front of a crowd.
By bedouin Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:48 pm
BenHoughton wrote:seriously bedouin how can you be so critical of the 1200s? its not the features that we're after, its the feel, the solidness & build quality, the knowledge that every club you walk into is going to have a pair


Last time I checked, you balance a tonearm on a 1200 the same as any other high end table; the pitch control works the same as any other turntable. I've never approached a 1200 and felt like, "Oh no! What will I do!!!!"

Like I said, some of the other decks are actually better built than the 1200. Most people would never know though because they're afraid of looking weird in front of their sheepish friends who are on the 1200 is the industry standard bandwagon.

... not to mention resale!!


If I buy a new pair of 1200s I'm not going to get much money for them used when used models are going for like $250 each. On the other hand, check out the resell on Vestax and 150s . . .

If I want to sell a used pair -- yeah, I guess you're right. But then again, that's true with most products. Used value stays pretty stagnant, especially with products where it's impossible to determine how many previous there were.

I mean i'm pretty open minded with these things but in terms of features.. well how many features do you need to mix vinyl? I mean more than 8% is going to sound not that great anyway right?


Well, considering the ST150 has key lock -- that can come in real handy with acapellas; pitch something up 3 or 4% without getting the chipmunk effect. Having higher pitch range should be very appealing to produces; want to see what a sample sounds like sped up by 20% without sampling it into the MPC first? No problem. Want to play a potential sample over a drum pattern you programmed on the MPC without sampling it in, but need to pitch it up (or perhaps stretch it) to sync it up? No problem. Producers should be jumping on better tables before anyone else.

Or let's say I'm doing a tape of breakbeats and instrumentals that sound okay or better at faster speeds. Maybe I have a tight drum break I want to cut up but it needs some extra RPM love. No problem. I've done that on a number of my mix tapes. What if you spin house or DnB? Many of those songs have no vocals and can easily withstand radical pitch alterations.

The way i see it, the 1200s are like the benchmark - if you've got the skills, they'll do the job. Other decks might be more forgiving, sure. But at the end of the day, 1200s should allow you to create the mix you want


Maybe some people have ideas and needs the 1200s can't meet. Maybe they don't like paying top dollar for a product that is technologically outdated and now inferior to models at the same price. Half the people yelling industry standard and insisting it's what you'll encounter at clubs don't even leave their bedroom.

Ok, i'll say it - i've never gotten down with any other brand decks.

But who needs/wants to anyway?


Creative people and ones not afraid of being stigmatized based on their consumer habits.

just my $0.02[/quote]
User avatar
By BenHoughton Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:15 pm
Bedouin, a very well thought through response.

I think at the end of the day, this argument does come down to personal preference becuase basically these days stantons do have a bunch of positives, as do technics

I'm not going to say anything further on the matter, as this argument could potentially be never ending....
:wink:
By zapp Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:48 pm
BenHoughton wrote:I'm not going to say anything further on the matter, as this argument could potentially be never ending because I believe you work for Stanton...
:wink:
By bedouin Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:38 am
If I worked for Stanton I wouldn't want to replace my c314s with CDJ-800s and I'd have an SA-5 not a PMC-05 Pro III. I also suppose I wouldn't be using Shure and Ortofon carts.