For discussion about setting up your studio and advice on the gear and equipment within it.

By mpire45 Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:55 pm
Yeah, the Mbox has SPDIF i/o. And yeah, invest in some high quality cables.

By arctec Wed Jun 16, 2004 12:47 pm
elmacaco,

Hey, I saw your posts here, and was just wonderin what you use to record onto.

I got Motu 828MK11 and Logic, and I'm quite happy with the sound of my MPC60 recording into it, but I don't do too much processing after it's recorded - then it starts to sound like plastic.

I also got an old Fostex R8 that needs the dust scrapped off it and when I get time I'm gonna be using that somewhere in the recording chain cos I know it sounds good (and there ain't no software that sounds like a slowed down tape machine 8)

By TZ Wed Jun 16, 2004 3:40 pm
artec,

so even with a good quality audio interface like MOTU, your recordings sound kind of "plastic"? Do you think the AD/DA convertors are not sufficient?

Do you have a mixer in your set up? Which one?

I'm trying to decide on which interface and software to get and the MOTU+Logic combo was one of my choices......

Peace

By arctec Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:30 pm
TZ

don't get me wrong - the motu is superb - just like the mpc60. it sits there and does it's job. I like the converters in it, and it is capable of 96Khz (just that this kills my G4 after a few too many plug ins)

I get the plastic feel if I PROCESS TOO MUCH once inside logic. I usually just keep it to a good compressor and reverb (space desinger comes as part of the Logic pro package and is top quality). So - it's back to basic principles for me - get it right B4 you record

I have a mixer, but don't use it cos it's a crappy Behringer :-( but I sometimes use it as a distortion box :D

Depending on how many ins you need, you may not need a mixer at all, I could definately get by without it.

Bottom line: I like my MOTU. It sounds good, works well with Logic and Mac.

By TZ Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:39 pm
I see, I misunderstood the first time. Thanks for your explanation....

Peace

By mpire45 Wed Jun 16, 2004 5:27 pm
Good AD/DA convertors when used at a high sampling (88.2 or 96) and bit (24) rate will offer you a recording with spacious headroom like high-end analog....Trust me on this, I work with analog and digital. But, the difference in what you have in between the source (MPC, ASR, etc.) and the destination (MOTU, PT 002, etc.). I always advise the producers that I work with to invest in a high-quality channel strip/mic pre (i.e. any Focusrite will suffice...their Platinum series sound incredible). A good channel strip (whether it's solid-sate or tube) will offer you an instrument input (bump the unbalanced signal to a balanced one), a preamp with good headroom, a compressor, an enhancer or eq, and an output with good headroom. Trust me on this, you will hear a difference in your signal...More presence and detail. I personally prefer the tube units...They offer me the sound I appreciate about analog; analog compression with added harmonics.

Bottom line, scrape up $500-1000 to invest in a good unit that will make your recordings compete with anything else done in pro studios.

Vaughan

By elmacaco Thu Jun 17, 2004 1:15 am
I use Nuendo and I really like the sound. I don't process too much either because of what you say, it's like eqing in sound forge, useful, but sounds like shit.

I will hopefully be getting a reel to reel soon and will use that somehow. Gotta try the 60's smpte!

I like the sound that Cool edit has when you record into it, thy got that code right.

By mpire45 Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:49 am
I use Nuendo and I really like the sound. I don't process too much either because of what you say, it's like eqing in sound forge, useful, but sounds like ****.

I will hopefully be getting a reel to reel soon and will use that somehow. Gotta try the 60's smpte!

I like the sound that Cool edit has when you record into it, thy got that code right.



Reel to reels are too much hassel...Good luck. If you're used to a digital enviroment, you'll be awaken by the work that analog will put you through. Also, tapes are getting harder to come by (unless you're getting a 2"...then it's worth the hassel). I do miss the tape saturation that analog reel to reels offer...

Oh yeah, Cool Edit is one the most slept-on DAW's in the market...Easy to use, not heavy on resources, and sounds good. I just upgraded to Adobe Audition (the upgrade to Cool Edit 2.x). They stepped the game up on Audtion...VST pluggins can be used, Rewire, better video implementation, etc.

Vaughan

By elmacaco Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:45 am
I'm not gonna be editing on tape, just straight recording.

By Terrahertz Thu Jun 17, 2004 8:44 am
DOVESKI wrote:Just make sure you record loud, you got to record loud with the digi001 and mBox to pick up the full frequencies. Let the peaks hit the red. And while your at it I'd probably pick up some sort of little mixer.


This is terrible advise never clip in digital because it will distort the sound.
Pro Tools might be a standart but it still sounds like shit when you mix inside the computer. Thats why when we use Pro Tools here we mix everything in the SSL and use Pro Tools only as a multitrack recorder and editor.

If Pro Tools sounded good inside the computer alot more pros would consider mixing in the box.

The reason for Pro Tools sounding like shit is because it uses a 48 bit "fixed" point engine. The reason Cubase SX,Nuendo,Logic.Sonar,samplitude,and other Native programs kick Pro Tools Ass in sound quality is because they use
32bit "float" point.

What this mean is that you dont have as much headroom in Pro Tools.
But thats not where it ends Pro Tools "Fixed Engine" is set where you loose
bits of data when you make dB reduction on the fader,therefor loosing bits and quality.

Thats why when we mix we use 48 outputs into the mixer and all the faders inside Pro tools set to 0 dB to keep the 24 bit wordlength threw out the whole signal path.

In the 32 bit "Float" and float being the keyword world, bringing the fader down a few or many dB's will not loose its sound quality or bit resoulution.
This happens because the recording engine gives you 8 xtra bits.
The 8-bit exponent gives the floating-point architecture an astonishing dynamic range spec of 1500 dB (8-bits = 256, and 2256 equals approximately 1500 dB) Fixed-point, with its 48-bits, gives you 288 dB of dynamic range.

However you do the math... if you've ever worked in a fixed point system you will know how difficult it is to maintain an excellent audio bit depth resolution without clipping somewhere along the path... i.e., it's extremely common that fixed-point systems end up with digital distortion due to clipping by the time you are done with a complex mix. You only need to use your ears.

BTW... those arguments saying that fixed-point is better are always made by companies that are stuck in a fixed-point world and need to find a way to justify it. Digidesign was one of these companies claiming such things for many years... but now that they support floating point when using native plugins they are finally admiting that floating point is superior.

Thanks Dan Duskin

Now onother thing when you record super loud and clip you are clipping
because the AD Converter reached its full headroom capicity.

When this happens the computer does not know how to represent the signal strengh so it clips because you over loaded the converter and therefor giving you a terrible glassy sound.

A good recording technic for people who use digital to record is to calibrate your converters. to +4dBu not dB but dBu. The reason for this is because when calibrated to +4 dBu and not -10 dBv Line level you are telling the converters to reduce input for +4 signals since there very hot signals compared to -10 signals.

And if you calibrate your converters to -10dBu you are telling your converters to increase the input for -10 signals. Therfor running a +4
signal into a -10dBu calibrated converter will overload and clip the signal.

-10 signals are usually always found on keyboard outs and the 8 indivitual out of all the MPC series Akai sampler Sequencers.

+4 signals are found on the MPC Main outs, all mic preamps and All DI boxes.

When you record in your program of choice I recomend to stay away from Sound blasters get your self a decent soundcard and decent set of converters. Get And RME Soundcard and a Apogeee Converter if you can afford it. Heck for $5,000 you can get a better sounding system then a Pro Tools HD 3 for 15,000 dollar sysem.

I have been able to sucessfully make Pro Tools sound as good as the MPC
but belive me turning your volume on the MPC is not the secret.

You want to set your volume half way. And you want your signal in Pro Tools to be halfway right in the midle thats what that line is for in Pro Tools.
The reason for this is you avoid clips and by still being in the 48 bit world you need to leave headroom for your plugins.

Think about it if your signal is at 0db. When you ad a plugin its goin to completyly **** distort. And you are going to be force to bring the fader down and therefor loose quality.

This is great advise mpire45
mpire45 wrote:Good AD/DA convertors when used at a high sampling (88.2 or 96) and bit (24) rate will offer you a recording with spacious headroom like high-end analog....Trust me on this, I work with analog and digital. But, the difference in what you have in between the source (MPC, ASR, etc.) and the destination (MOTU, PT 002, etc.). I always advise the producers that I work with to invest in a high-quality channel strip/mic pre (i.e. any Focusrite will suffice...their Platinum series sound incredible). A good channel strip (whether it's solid-sate or tube) will offer you an instrument input (bump the unbalanced signal to a balanced one), a preamp with good headroom, a compressor, an enhancer or eq, and an output with good headroom. Trust me on this, you will hear a difference in your signal...More presence and detail. I personally prefer the tube units...They offer me the sound I appreciate about analog; analog compression with added harmonics.

Bottom line, scrape up $500-1000 to invest in a good unit that will make your recordings compete with anything else done in pro studios.

Vaughan


I run a tubetracker from the MPC 8 out into the 8 ins of the TL Audio at home using Nuendo 2,Apogee Rossetta 800 and Rme MADI.

Qick story Tubes where once the king they gain back their crown when Pro Tools became a Standard since it sounded so bad.

For any help hit me up at my email. :D

By mpire45 Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:48 pm
Terrahertz...GREAT ADVICE!! I second every statement you made!
User avatar

By mesh Thu Jun 17, 2004 4:23 pm
thats really interesting. nice to learn a little.

By arctec Thu Jun 17, 2004 6:07 pm
Terrahertz,

thats interesting stuff your saying.

Elmacaco - I done a few experiments with my R8 and it rocks. Let us know how you do with your tape.

I got different uses for mine (when it's running) - loading drum hits n stuff onto it and sampling from there, laying down just the drums/bass and syncing to vox/whatever on the mac. Somtimes used it to experiment on an overall mix. anything goes. But I need to get back to it and use it as a tracker once everything is programmed. (Nothing nicer that slowing it down/speeding it up a few notches)

I was thinking of using the Mac purely as an fx box when mixing from tape, but thats probably gonna need a big re-wire, so I gotta wait to find the time.

Big up to ya'll

By Terrahertz Thu Jun 17, 2004 6:22 pm
Thanks guys I'm very new to posting here but been watching for a few weeks.
And I like the vibe.

I use the MPC 3000 and if you guys ever need help with the MPC series of samplers email me.

By mpire45 Thu Jun 17, 2004 9:19 pm
Thanks guys I'm very new to posting here but been watching for a few weeks.
And I like the vibe.

I use the MPC 3000 and if you guys ever need help with the MPC series of samplers email me.


Glad to have you here...We gotta keep exchanges ideas to help better our craft.

Vaughan aka 45