By dtaa pla muk
Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:51 am
i just got a large email from jj regarding some of this os2xl stuff.
a lot of good news. i understand it all and know that things gotta be a certain way sometimes.
first: a sigh of relief.
ahhh.
second: regarding filter cutoff: jj maintains that filter1,2 and ADSR should be all on the same screen. this leaves little space for VELOCITY->CUTOFF. in effect, it sounds like he is actually bumping velocity->cutoff in favor of filter2 because of SPACE, not because of hardware limitation...!
ie, "if we require velocity->cutoff, it'll have to just go in some other GPE space, or maybe a WINDOW screen in the filter GPE page.
EITHER WAY, NO F'IN BIG DEAL, RIGHT? easy street.
a lot of good news. i understand it all and know that things gotta be a certain way sometimes.
first: a sigh of relief.
[SIMULT PAD.]: CHORD can be substituted.
ahhh.
second: regarding filter cutoff: jj maintains that filter1,2 and ADSR should be all on the same screen. this leaves little space for VELOCITY->CUTOFF. in effect, it sounds like he is actually bumping velocity->cutoff in favor of filter2 because of SPACE, not because of hardware limitation...!
The PAD velocity of MPC1000 does not become useful.
"Filter2" will be more useful than "Velocity->Cutoff."
If required, it adds to other screens.
ie, "if we require velocity->cutoff, it'll have to just go in some other GPE space, or maybe a WINDOW screen in the filter GPE page.
EITHER WAY, NO F'IN BIG DEAL, RIGHT? easy street.




