Post your views and questions about the Akai MPC2500
User avatar
By DJ Hellfire Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:11 am
Explicit- wrote:Im not sure???

Havent noticed the difference.

I do know that the MPC2500 loads faster than my old MPC500 that I had.



What I did was save a beat to CF. Then immediately saved it to the HD. On the CF, it took nearly 1 minute. HD was under 15 seconds.
User avatar
By Explicit- Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:18 am
Dope. Where did you get a 40gb HD from? I was looking to get one but I ended up buying a 100gb Toshiba drive that cost like $5 less then all the 40gb I found.

How much did you pay?
User avatar
By DJ Hellfire Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:22 am
Ebay! $32 shipped. I started to buy a large drive, but then I thought, in nearly 9 years of owning an MPC, I don't even have 1GB worth of beats, and I have probably nearly 1000 beats. So I know I will never use 40GB. It really is overkill.
User avatar
By Explicit- Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:33 am
DJ Hellfire wrote:Ebay! $32 shipped. I started to buy a large drive, but then I thought, in nearly 9 years of owning an MPC, I don't even have 1GB worth of beats, and I have probably nearly 1000 beats. So I know I will never use 40GB. It really is overkill.

It is overkill. :lol:

But yeah I got my 100gb HD from ebay aswell and paid $29 for it and shipping was free. I will never fill it up though. 100gb is insane for an MPC.

I also have a 4gb CF card. :lol:
By _Stilo_ Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:47 am
DJ Hellfire wrote:I always thought flash based storage media was faster than hard disc storage media?! No?

Depends on the reader you use. I guess the components Akai put in the 2500 are not the fastest.
By jrides Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:54 pm
I knew different types of SD cards are faster/slower depending on th brand/place of manufacture. Different brands of SIMMs perform better sometimes with the same specs. Hard drives with the same specs can be faster depending on the manufacturer.. I think you can see where im going with this.
User avatar
By elevated Thu Jan 22, 2009 3:31 pm
Just to throw this in--

You might want to mention what model of CF card you're comparing with. These things have a HUGE range of speeds. I didn't realize until I started using a Sandisk "Extreme III" card... which averages an insane THREE times faster save/load time than my Sandisk "Ultra II" card.
User avatar
By Explicit- Thu Jan 22, 2009 4:17 pm
elevated wrote:Just to throw this in--

You might want to mention what model of CF card you're comparing with. These things have a HUGE range of speeds. I didn't realize until I started using a Sandisk "Extreme III" card... which averages an insane THREE times faster save/load time than my Sandisk "Ultra II" card.

I have a SanDisk Extreme III 4gb. :D
User avatar
By Upright Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:26 pm
elevated wrote:Just to throw this in--

You might want to mention what model of CF card you're comparing with. These things have a HUGE range of speeds. I didn't realize until I started using a Sandisk "Extreme III" card... which averages an insane THREE times faster save/load time than my Sandisk "Ultra II" card.



I'm using a Sandisk Ultra II which is my fastest card LOL......three times faster would be fabulous!! :D
User avatar
By elevated Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:58 pm
Do it! Heck, get the "Extreme IV" card. I had no idea that the MPC would be able to make use of a high performance CF card, but was VERY pleasantly surprised. I literally sat there testing with a stop watch to measure how much faster the new card was.