
By Danoc
Wed Apr 03, 2019 12:54 am
If Akai would get with Spectrasonics IT WOULD BE OVER! They need to do that ASAP! Put Omnisphere in the hardware and software.

Every Spectrasonics product has an integration point allowing them all to work together. It's an ecosystem. For a couple years Spectrasonics solicited user feedback asking what the people wanted to see next from them. The most popular answer was keyboard (vintage and experimental) emulation, and Keyscape came to life a couple years later.
feature introductions,
new products, and a list of missing features that is counter to the purpose of the instrument. If I were Akai, and you have an MPC... my controllers would be able to control an MPC in ways no other controller can. Want that functionality? Gotta have this Akai controller too.CharlesRandolph wrote:@eyalc this is my main issue with many of these companies. The standards are just too low, and many pieces being release are a stop gaps.
Is the MPC X or Live fully integrated with Omnisphere 2.6?

Eyalc wrote:Man, if anything, Akai could learn a lot from Spectrasonics. They're one of the few companies that has successfully made the transition from sound / instrument company to a sound / instrument / software company. IMO it's because of their focus on core products - ones they're really, really good at, and making them the best they can be. They solicit feedback from pros in a meaningful way, so that when they introduce new features, their user base is never like![]()
Every Spectrasonics product has an integration point allowing them all to work together. It's an ecosystem. For a couple years Spectrasonics solicited user feedback asking what the people wanted to see next from them. The most popular answer was keyboard (vintage and experimental) emulation, and Keyscape came to life a couple years later.
Akai however, is all over the place (speaking Akai-branded products - realize InMusic is bigger). Rhythm Wolf, the headphones, speakers, turntable, rhythm cat - or whatever it was called, MPCs, Force, controllers - and NONE of them talk to each other other than general standards. The result is a bunch of products with 2 year shelf life (or less), bugs,feature introductions,
new products, and a list of missing features that is counter to the purpose of the instrument. If I were Akai, and you have an MPC... my controllers would be able to control an MPC in ways no other controller can. Want that functionality? Gotta have this Akai controller too.
Sooner or later they'll realize what companies like Spectrasonics has... Akai is no longer an instrument company that happens to make software. They're a software company that happens to make instruments. Then and only then will they start focusing on creating an integrated experience across their product lines, and stop introducing these one-offs with limited shelf life that look more like head-scratchers than innovative new products that make people say... Yesssssssssss. For now, they continue to look like the sailors running a ship with no captain.
Sorry, rant over. Back to topic - Omnisphere is the truth. LOL

CharlesRandolph wrote:@eyalc this is my main issue with many of these companies. The standards are just too low, and many pieces being release are a stop gaps.
Is the MPC X or Live fully integrated with Omnisphere 2.6?

CharlesRandolph wrote:They should've released just the MPC X and put all the ideas/effort behind it. The problem lays with Akai Pro treating people it's a regular customer, instead of professional musical clients. That's why the marketing is like this now. I don't need performance demo and fake project FTC leaks. I want the white sheets, manuals, and demos on how to integrate it into my existing setup.
It's like on YouTube, everyone thinks they're teachers or collect gear like baseball cards or showing off all the gear they have. Yet, their music is HOT TRASH! Why do hey have 7 drum machines, that basically do the same thing, and all they're making is 2 bar loop.![]()
Does OMNISPHERE 2.6 allow for sharing of user created mapping controls?

Unreallystic wrote:
with that said, I actually hopped in this thread out of curiosity with Omnisphere. Why do you guys like it so much for the Live? I don't have it, and have been thinking about getting it, but based on what I understand (and please correct me if I am wrong), the strength of omnisphere lies not in its presets, but how you can evolve the sounds (similar to the Roland D50/D-05, which apparently is sort of its grandfather), and while that owuld be fine when using controller mode, it would be USELESS in stand-alone and devolve to just a regular synth. Am I missing something?
- Unreall
Danoc wrote:Lol you said 7 drum machines and music hot trash lol l was never the one to have a bunch of stuff just to have it. All l need is one master it and go.
Mapping sharing? Don't know about that bro.
Unreallystic wrote:Most of what we want, requires beyond bug fixes will require a hardware iteration for more horse power, and we won't want to pay for it, so they have to/need to wait until the technology is affordable enough, and they've exhausted the resources off the money already spent. I just can't be mad at them.

CharlesRandolph wrote:Danoc wrote:Lol you said 7 drum machines and music hot trash lol l was never the one to have a bunch of stuff just to have it. All l need is one master it and go.
Mapping sharing? Don't know about that bro.
What would it take to map other hardware?
From them:
Omnisphere is the only software synth in the world to offer a Hardware Synth Integration feature. This remarkable innovation transforms over 65 well-known hardware synthesizers into extensive hands-on controllers that unlock Omnisphere’s newly expanded synthesis capabilities.
Roland JD-XA
Roland JD-Xi
Roland JP-08
Roland JP-8000
Roland JU-06
Roland JUNO-106
Roland JX-03
Roland SE-02
Roland SH-01A
Roland SH-201
Roland D-50
Roland GAIA
Roland Super Jupiter
Roland System-1
Roland System-8
Roland VP-03
Korg microKorg
Korg Minilogue
Korg Minilogue XD
Korg Monologue
Korg MS-20ic
Korg MS-2000
Korg Prologue
Korg Radias
Moog Little Phatty
Moog Minitaur
Moog Sirin
Moog Slim Phatty
Moog Sub 37
Moog Subsequent 37
Moog Sub Phatty
Moog Voyager
Dave Smith Mopho
Dave Smith OB-6
Dave Smith Pro 2
Dave Smith Prophet 6
Dave Smith Prophet 8
Dave Smith Prophet 12
Dave Smith Prophet X
Dave Smith REV2
Nord Lead 1
Nord Lead 2
Nord Lead 3
Nord Lead 4
Nord Lead A1
Nord Stage 3
Nord Wave
Andromeda A6
Novation Bass Station II
Novation Circuit Mono Station
Novation MiniNova
Novation Peak
Virus A
Virus B
Virus C
Virus Indigo 1
Virus Indigo 2
Virus TI
Yamaha Reface CS
Studiologic Sledge
Deepmind
Danoc wrote:I don't know you might want to hit them up to do more. Do you have some hardware in mind?
It was very easy to do Roland stuff being he worked with them.
Heck l wish he would put the Roland 3080 in Omni. The hardware sounds are even in Omni. Freakin dope.
