By
Jamon
Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:39 pm
My opinion of the machine isn't swayed by the Kangz. If Roland made it, I'd think the same.
The people saying they don't need MIDI stuff, lots of tracks, or anything too advanced to make beats seem to forget how much this thing costs.
If all you need to do is what the Beat Thang does now, load up samples, make patterns easily by tapping pads that light up, then you can buy a SP-404SX for $400. If you need more MIDI stuff, so you can sequence a synth, throw in a MPC500 for $600. That's $1,000, like the Beat Thang.
What does the Thang do today that justifies that price? What can't the SP-404SX or MPC500 do? They all sample, use batteries, have pads, and FX. The Thang has pitch wheel. Okay, but the MPC500 has a pitch slider. It also has far more advanced software as of right now, allowing you to step edit, copy MIDI events, etc. The Beat Thang has built-in sounds. Is that worth $600?
The MPC500 also is smaller, boots faster, has less latency, and a screen that can be seen in sunlight. But the Thang is almost twice the price. It's up there with the MPC1000, which gives you JJ OS, more audio outs, more MIDI ins/outs. What's the difference making you choose a Thang over a MPC1000? You can load more samples, but if you don't even care there's only 16 tracks then why do you need more than 128MB worth of samples?
Some day, the Thang might blow the competition away. But they have a lot of work to do, and it's for sale now, the hardware supposedly shipping in 1 month. I don't even think they've produced any finalized units for beta testing yet. How can they possibly do that in less than a month and have a polished product ready to sell? The software itself isn't even out of beta stage, missing basic features, and crashing on many PCs.
It doesn't matter who made it, Roland, Akai, or Yamaha. The facts are the facts, and that is what we should base our judgment of the machine on. If people like the machine, and just don't want to support the Kangz because they don't like how they did things, that's their choice. But even if you like it, you must admit that right now the offering seems slim for the price they're asking. If you're getting on board now, it must be out of trust and hope.
But what do you base your trust and hope on? The Kangz are sub-contracting development to 3rd parties, not doing it in house. Do you know the details of their contract? What if the team keeps the source code, and their term ends in 6 months. Who is going to fix the bugs, the Kangz? How long do you expect them to keep working on this, adding features, 1 year? 2 years? 5? What if they can't even stay in business that long. We don't know much and they're new.
Plus they've already been busted violating 2 GPL licenses so far, using forum puppets, freaking out when things don't go their way, starting battles with potential customers, giving false/misleading information, and using shady marketing tactics, who knows what else we don't know about yet. Maybe the Kangz are really nice guys and fun to be around, but these facts don't scream confidence and trust in the future of their business. It sounds more like bankruptcy.