elmacaco wrote:The whole argument that you can change the sound is pointless, You are supposed to change a sound to make it sound good, not change it so you can get away from using it. If you take a sample from a recent Hip hop record, drums, loop or one shot, it already sounds good to you, and you are most likely "flipping it" to cover up your lazyness.
Also, flipping it means different things to different people.
You're right.. Flipping it means many things to people. But the kick or snare that your sampling from that rock record sounded good or good enough to were you wanted to **** with it right. Who says a drum hit had to sound like complete shit in order for you to sample it.
Some of you guys are taking this shit too damn serious. I agree that biting is wack. Biting styles or complete loops from a current producer. But it really doesnt matter where anybody samples their shit from. A lot of times cats will sample or copy a drum pattern from the latest hiphop joint and the shit still sounds wack anyway. Case in point...Tell me J-Kwon's tipsy isnt a wack rendition of clipes grinding. Then they got the nerve to use that noise that is a perfect example of what I think Elm and Matt and all these other cats are talking about. That's lazy and plain wack. That's what I dont have any respect for. But sampling a kick from a new joint doesn't make you a lazy artist. WTF, we are all SAMPLING!!!
There's some cat right now reading this whole shit, who plays drums and all his own instuments, thinking he is totally more creative than the cats who just sample. Sampling, if you really wanna be as technical as not sampling a hit from a current song, would be straight biting!! Now matter how you flip it, the sound was never yours to begin with. If it wasnt Timberland, then it was Steely Dan who put effort into making his drums sound good. But Timberland samples drums too and flips it. Who the hell is he sampling from? Do we know? Do you really care? No. The reason why you dont care is because his shit is so different. His track as a whole. Not just a drum kick or loop. If the track sounds original, and its good, what's the damn difference. IF he told you he sampled a kick from Nottz, would that make him an a$$hole or something. Of course not..
If I sample a kick from an old jazz record and someone else, some other part of the world, samples that kick, and he puts his track out before mine, am I lazy just because I have the same kick he has but he came out first?Thats ridiculous. That why cats gotta put this code of ethics thing in perspective. If cats are gonna be anal about this then, dont sample at all. Stop sampling altogether, go buy a drum set and bang your own shit out. Exclusively... Then its truly original.
In the end, unless its painfully obvious, nobody knows where anybody's getting their drums from.. unless they tell you. But YOU know where you got them from and you know you didnt bang out a drum set to attain that sound. Why not feel funny about jackin Amhad Jamal's drums after he spent years playing in small clubs, making very little money, just to have some 20 something year old cat sample and flip his drums and go platinum. Are you gonna send a portion of your royalty check to his family cause you sampled his kick? Hell no!! Its a **** drum hit.
We all wanna be different and artistic with our tracks when we choose to sample (I hope we all do), but we're still doing it with other people's music. Current or old, hiphop or rock. Thats the bottom line. Lets put this shit in perspective.
Peace