finnegan wrote:Archiving on an outdated format may not be a good idea.
It's not a good idea. Agreed?
And it isn't as good as dedicated formats. UNLESS you really know what to look for. But that doesn't mean he can't do it if he wants to. I think he asked for opinions, no? Still allowed here right? Opinions?
He asked if there was a point to using it for saturation. I pointed him to a very similar and very recent thread on the subject. Where's the backhand move in that?
And just because someone has an MPC doesn't exclude them from not having much money later. I mean, by your logic, once someone has one MPC they can own as many as they want, whenever they want? I don't know
about you, but I had to save for my MPC and once I got it I was a bit skint for a while.
If OP doesn't have much money, then it would be irresponsible to advise him on buying a recorder for which repairs, spares, and media will come at a premium. Point about the MPC is, you saved for it. Save for a dedicated archival system. Don't skimp on the most important aspect of your work: its storage.
I think you are just upset because someone chose to disagree with your re-posting of an old thread in reply to someone's question. Well. Tough. I felt like replying instead of being a dink and telling someone to use the search function in a backhanded and petty way.
The only thing petty and backhanded here is your insults. If, by replying, you have absolved yourself from being a "dink" (really? dink?) then you are implying that I am a "dink" - in a backhanded kind of way, naturally.
Upset? I'm LMAO.

A pessimist is one who makes difficulties of his opportunities and an optimist is one who makes opportunities of his difficulties.