mr_debauch wrote:BGREEN wrote:OP - I know you said you would like an older MPC, but if you already have the 500, why not get a newer MPC that will be "Cross-Compatible" with the 500? I could be wrong, but I am under the impression that the 500, 1000, and 2500 can read most of each others files (Programs etc), have a CF slot, and are even cheaper than the 60..
Just suggesting because thats what I plan to do LOL.
Might grab the 2500, but the 5000 keeps getting cheaper?!?

I am not sure how compatible the 500 would be with the 1000 pr 2500 once JJOS is installed which is what would happen.
Also, the 60 is one of the cheapest MPCs if you dont get a fully loaded one. Oh and lets not forget... if somebody already owns a new school mpc why would they get another one that sounds exactly the same when they could go for a unit that has different sonic characteristics?
I'm finding the 2500 anywhere from 800 to 1000 with DVD writer, Full RAM, and it also has efx and time stretch. 60 about same price range, with no features... XL is obviously going to be the cheapest with an average price of 500.
My friend has the 2500 and it loaded my beats, not sure if he had JJOS. I'm not sure it will make a difference, being that the 2500's OS is different than the 500's in the first place. Really need to look into that before making my purchase.. Good Point!
The 500 also loaded his ChopShopped Loops which was cool.
Don't get me wrong, I would love a 60, and have a love for many Akai products. But I guess my reasoning would be to have compatible systems/media storage, along with the advanced features of a "Larger" modern MPC. That way if I decide to sell the 500, my programs will work with the new system. Crossing Fingers.
As far as sonic characteristics, is it really true that the 500 sounds "exactly the same" as the 1000, 2500, or 5000? And will sonic characteristics rule over bang for the buck? A question that will forever be debatable..