gertie wrote:....like spam this forum about the maschine
More like insecure MPC fanboys getting their panties in a bunch whenever people talk about Maschine.
gertie wrote:....like spam this forum about the maschine

W. Steele wrote:Not trying to turn this into another "Maschine vs. MPC" thread so until you have something constructive to help the MPC users on here emptysea, GTFOH .
If you can help us out w/ your vast knowledge of the amazing capabilities of Maschine please do share, but stick to the subject instead of being a fckin' commercial .


Undertow wrote:If you could select slices via external controller, or MPC, Maschine would maybe be more useful. As it is, I wasn't impressed by the 1.6 features and I don't like it's controller much. I did give it a chance, like I have many times since it's debut, but it's not for me in it's current state. However, if it's only it's sounds that you want, you can use them without Maschine...you just have to find the folder on the hard drive. You already have them installed, so go find them. They're just basic wav files. It would be multitudes easier unless you want to use the software for a particular reason. The sounds are OK for use with drum replacement software when those acoustic recordings sound a bit soggy and you didn't record it, so can't re-record.


Ill-Green wrote:In the future Maschine will just be software and any sampler will be able to control it.

jpeg wrote:why rock them together?
dabmeister wrote:Ill-Green wrote:In the future Maschine will just be software and any sampler will be able to control it.


cyrus wrote:maschine is way more powerful, has better timing, and overall has better specs and makes better beats. its unbeatable in that area.......