
By crossings
Tue Mar 06, 2012 9:39 pm
is it possible that the addition of the MPC STUFF logo is causing these issues? were these issues present during development [before adding the logo]??

crossings wrote:is it possible that the addition of the MPC STUFF logo is causing these issues? were these issues present during development [before adding the logo]??

Dave_Mode wrote:A record collection is a necessity not a luxery.

Saaword wrote:yeah it seems for the HIGH price of the display the makers really shorted the MPC users... I will not support this product. Makers, you should hae taken notes on customer service from the Valixi'nator! and his stuff was reasonable in the price area... Old MPC screen it will have to be until someone can correctly and with out raping the mpc users pockets!
should have tested these with some mpc users prior for a few months before you put them to the mark... just a bit of advice for your next attempt
Dave_Mode wrote:A record collection is a necessity not a luxery.
Saaword wrote:yeah it seems for the HIGH price of the display the makers really shorted the MPC users... I will not support this product. Makers, you should hae taken notes on customer service from the Valixi'nator! and his stuff was reasonable in the price area... Old MPC screen it will have to be until someone can correctly and with out raping the mpc users pockets!
should have tested these with some mpc users prior for a few months before you put them to the mark... just a bit of advice for your next attempt
omarphi215 wrote: $165 is a great price for a new LCD screen when the used ones are more that $200. In terms of customer service, I think it's great! I have issues with mine and currently working on getting it corrected but I always get fast email responses from both mpc stuff and envision. They always return my calls and super helpful so I don't see how they are lacking in customer service. Keep in mind i was upset when I realized there was latency in the display and the screen often had mixed up words but these were issues that would have cost us more to have fixed and the screens would. It have been available for another year. Maybe they should have mentioned that, maybe it's not that much of a big deal when you have a clean workin screen that messes up slightly versus a screen you can't read at all. At the end of the day they are providing somethin that almost every 2000 user needs or will need soon. Theyade an attempt that also could probably care less about. It's cool if you don't support the screen because there are plenty more who will. I say give them a shot, tell them all of the bugs with your screen to
Help them make better ones.
omarphi215 wrote:I agree a larger test base would have helped but in their defense they are a small
Company that if I'm not mistaking, only got started because NI one else was making an attempt to provide brand new screens. Will you support the product once all of te bugs are fixed? Do you own one now? I ask because I felt jipped when I saw the lag and the distortion of some characters but I got over that quickly. Because it was better than my oem screen that didn't allow me to

envisionelec wrote:crossings wrote:is it possible that the addition of the MPC STUFF logo is causing these issues? were these issues present during development [before adding the logo]??
No, that's impossible. It's a processing issue...

Tapuno wrote:I have a 2000 classic that needs ram because the onboard is burned out, will this be an issue if I use your screen?
Dave_Mode wrote:A record collection is a necessity not a luxery.

DSTRUCT wrote:I feel like a **** wizard.
Lampdog wrote:Stop harrassing peeps, try'n 2 get 'em 2 check your dingdong