jpeg wrote:i think studio will sell well more so if it was completely battery powered
but i see the devic being used extensively by traveling musicians and djs think of the peeps that use an mpc as aprt of they live set but dont wanna lug they mpc cross country and risk it being damaged so they will **** with the studio.
or cats on the tourbus they wanna make beats real quick they will **** with studio.
also there is a huge leasure class of beatmakers that aint that seriosu but see it as a fun hobby i feel they will be attracted to the slim profile that is fun but no too intrusive.
plus some peeps really dig the small slimmed down setups these days and may seek to emulate it with the studio (think madlib with his sp303 and records)
so i think they have a great product in the studio, its not for me i want the ren
Those and people who have little interest in the Renaissance's audio components. Though I totally agree with you, I think it would be a mistake for Akai or others to assume that the Studio only appeals to people with limited, novel or hobbyist demands. I'll reiterate. Even where money is not an issue, there are a lot of people who wouldn't likely use the analog audio I/O of a MPC (
unless it was a stand-alone one and even then they may opt for the digital I/O) or the Ren's emulation but would instead choose to use their higher end devices. The Studio also potentially appeals to these people. Even if they decided upon the Renaissance (
likely due to the implicit build quality) this would still be so.
With the advent of the MPC software, if it lives up to expectations, the way those people worked will now be even more streamlined and immediate when using a Studio or even the Ren and bypassing the analog I/O.
xparis001 wrote:if your looking for a discussion on the best beat production tool with batteries, profanity, name calling, and general trolling, i suspect it's gonna happen right below this post in 3...2... 
