Can't decide which MPC to choose? Read these resources or post your questions here.
User avatar
By abc Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:22 am
I always here about people sampling on the asr and sequencing on the mpc, but it's always a 2xl. I get why you would use the asr for sampling but why always a 2xl? Is the sequencer different from the others or for that warm sound? jw
User avatar
By Metatron72 Sun Sep 16, 2012 6:50 am
abc wrote:I always here about people sampling on the asr and sequencing on the mpc, but it's always a 2xl. I get why you would use the asr for sampling but why always a 2xl? Is the sequencer different from the others or for that warm sound? jw


In recent times you might see the setup more because people literally want "The Kanye Setup". Although I believe it's a 2000 Classic he was using. Outside of that probably because the 2000/XL units were cheaper than the 3000 that preceded them. The 3000 and XL's were released after the ASR-10 was discontinued but I guess there were so many ASR's in circulation still in the mid to late 90's and early 2000's that the XL was most popular in. If the two units have been put together more recently in people's setups it's likely down to both machines being excellent and fairly cheap, seldom over $500 each.

Generally speaking no one likes the ASR sequencer. People love the sampling and sound as you alluded to, and the non destructive chopping/sample copying is legendary in it's dopeness, but sequencing on it falls short. So that's the number one reason you see MPC's MIDI'd to ASR on the regular.
User avatar
By jibber Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:08 pm
The warm sound? 2000XL doesn't have a "warm" sound...

It might just be a common setup, but i've used my MPC500 as a sequencer in combination with the ASR as well... works just as good.

Personally i prefer the 2000XL simply because of the pads, they have the best feel out of all the MPCs in my opinion.
User avatar
By tapedeck Wed Sep 19, 2012 2:22 pm
the xl sequencer added some nice improvements too - i dare say the best hardware sequencer ever designed.
the asr is i dare say the best hardware sampler ever designed.

the combo is legendary.

also i think that besides small aesthetic preferences (and the jog wheel), the xl improves upon the classic in almost every way...so figure lots of classic users upgraded.
User avatar
By Lampdog Wed Sep 19, 2012 3:33 pm
Classic users LOVE that jog wheel, lmao.
I used it before and I hated it.

I loved the 2kxl jog wheel, faster you spin the more data it changed, slower you spin the less data and more detailed the values became.
User avatar
By abc Sun Oct 28, 2012 1:53 am
tapedeck wrote:the xl sequencer added some nice improvements too - i dare say the best hardware sequencer ever designed.

I've only used the 1000, in what way is the xl different? (sequencer wise obviously)
User avatar
By tapedeck Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:02 pm
abc wrote:
tapedeck wrote:the xl sequencer added some nice improvements too - i dare say the best hardware sequencer ever designed.

I've only used the 1000, in what way is the xl different? (sequencer wise obviously)

not too much different from what i can tell.

now jj osxl on a 1000 is a killer sequencer.
the sub-par hardware is my only issue with a jj 1k.
By Clint Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:21 pm
Lampdog wrote:Classic users LOVE that jog wheel...I used it before and I hated it.


To the OP, have you seen the threads in the other forums about the MPC/ ASR setup?
User avatar
By abc Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:36 am
I assume you mean me? I don't remember, I think I did a light search on this forum and didn't find what I was looking for
Metatron72 wrote:If the two units have been put together more recently in people's setups it's likely down to both machines being excellent and fairly cheap, seldom over $500 each.

I feel like this pretty much sums up what I was looking hear.