Exchange tips and tricks for the Akai MPC4000
By dryad-66 Sun Apr 28, 2013 7:10 am
roecker wrote:dryad-66,

I am the opposite of you. ALL of my gear is midi synced and bad timing is no beuno in my setup. I know tiny timing errors are not the end of the world but come on. Akai has made amazing sequencers and stepping back and allowing slop like the 5000 has in is an embarresment. Thanks Numark........... :WTF:


It is what it is and its not gonna go away.If you dont like it and it does not fit into your perfect synced set up then so be it.Apart from some messy digital timing crap its a full on box.Loads of fun and for me it was fast and tight.I just see it as a independant groove machine workstation.Have not got time to debate the negatives,just the positives as i see them.
By dustymaestro Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:05 pm
labcoats wrote:
dustymaestro wrote:In real life, these things arent pronounced as you make it seem. You would have to stop listening to the music and focus in on jitter. :WTF:




Wrong - timing profoundly matters. But its really to much to go on to here.

Ive always liked the random feature in Live's impulse sampler. I wish mpcs had something like that.


The random feature you mention doesn't shift the timing. As I recall it creates a pseudo doubling effect and or auto panning and maybe velocities. I cant be 100% certain. Anyway, I hated it because it actually sounded sloppy.

I think the impulse random feature can be created with the 4000. Just off the top of my head - setting up two LFOs to trigger velocity and panning would probably be in the right ball park.

Anyway, I get it, you like slop and thats fine. Many of us dont.


What you call midi jitter on the mpc 5000 is considered better than a tight drummer who can play meter in real life. If a hardware sequencer has a max 5 ms of "random shift" (not that random if you look at it), it can't be called "sloppy", because the best option of a real drummer is to be at around 15ms of maximum shift. Is it really that sloppy as some of you claim?


I never claimed the random feature shifted the timing. :mrgreen:

Your wrong, there are random features for filter, envelope, l&r,etc.
Stop talking out your ass.

Yes you can do it on the 4000. It takes programming, that was his point. :Sigh: Its just tedious.
Last edited by dustymaestro on Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By dustymaestro Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:08 pm
labcoats wrote:Give me an example of why 512mb of ram is crippling - without resorting to a BS 5 gig piano scenario.


:lol: Bosendorfer, Fender, sampled at ever key on multilevels. :nod:


labcoats wrote: You have lost the argument so have resorted to insulting Simon.


He knows what hes doing. Im only playing along. Plus that boy is giving me to much ammo. I hope he twisted my words around on purpose. :popcorn: Is he really that stupid? :lol:
Last edited by dustymaestro on Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:32 pm, edited 5 times in total.
By dustymaestro Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:13 pm
sirparksalot wrote::hmmm: wtf has this thread turned into? I don't even know what you all are debating lmao :lol:


Exactly, its mostly bullshit to people who just make music. I was working on the 5000 yesterday. None of the shit they talk really matters in the real world.


So Phia Pros wrote:cant we all just push some pads?


Thats that Rodney King.
By dustymaestro Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:20 pm
dryad-66 wrote:Ive owned a ton of sequencers.samplers and drum machines and also play percussion ectect.I had no problem with bad timing with the 5k and ive owned 2.And thats sitting right next to a 4k,mduw,rm1x and sw ectect.You get the point.But hey,i dont midi sync them.Just BPM and stop/start ect like decks.Most of my stuff is recorded in real time.


roecker wrote:dryad-66,

I am the opposite of you. ALL of my gear is midi synced and bad timing is no beuno in my setup. I know tiny timing errors are not the end of the world but come on. Akai has made amazing sequencers and stepping back and allowing slop like the 5000 has in is an embarresment. Thanks Numark........... :WTF:



Great example of how workflow differ's in real life. Roecker, I hear you about the midi clock sync. It is a big reason for the 4000 for me. The thing is if the 5000's midi clock was better, I would be more than happy with it. I actually would rather stay on the 5. I prefer its sound.
By e9000k Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:48 pm
Switch from 5000 to 4000 for the same reason, now I run a 4000 and a 3000 LE side by side using Sync Gen LE clock. Rock solid
User avatar
By Blue Haze Wed May 01, 2013 2:28 pm
Opinions are welcome but calling someone an idiot on a 4k forum, talking about 4ks, in the midst of 4k users isn't the best way either.

Each mpc is the king within it's forum among the users. On a 4k forum of course 4k is king. :nod:

With that say case is closed!