
Just a recap to make sure that I have this right. I've been working on this for a few days now and I am almost done. Video coming soon on.
So, the advantage/ reason for MULTIS...
1) there is no multiple track mixer for volume and such that is convenient.
2) MULTIS allow for programs to have different setting for FX, Pan, midi, output and if you are using Aksys you have an easy visual for fader grouping among other things.
Why number 1 is important...if you, like me, were simply using one multi for a song and thus using many tracks, in many sequences you would only be able to use the mute and solo functions, or automated pad volume changes(actually never tried this, it just occurred to me)
Warning...
A thing to consider is how one plans to track out drums. If you use a drum program and have your drums routed to individual outs then you could have overlapping sounds on the same outputs if you have MULTI parts going to individual outputs.
(Which makes me realize the importance of having the Z4 also...now I can have only drums on one machine's 8 outputs and the other be for the other machine's MULTIS output.)
Modulation Matrix
So MULTI Parts and the Mod Matrix are the real force majeure when used in combination. At first I was thinking only about using the Mod matrix as a way to create synth sounds with a sample trimmed down.
What I gather you all were trying to get at is that the Mod Matrix used in tandem with Parts (Programs:- the same program can be assigned over and over again to a different part) can allow you to for example use your Qlinks as the Source and have different destinations in each MULTI part.
Due to the modulation patching (specifically the amount of sources) you can do things like have the LFO -> Pitch, Modwheel-> LFO 1 Depth, & have each Qlink turn a zones volume up or down. (now I see why this thing is brilliant)
I have to remember that in all of this the Song, Sequence and Tracks run independent of the switching between MULTI parts. Thus once the sequence is playing you can (in Aksys: faders) raise and lower levels.
Conclusion I have a question....
Are you MPC4000 users organizing your Programs in a highly organized manner? Example "Program 909 Drums", "Program Moog synth"
or are you making programs on the fly with many different samples and putting specific sounds on specific pads in each program? example: in all of your Programs a Kick is in the bottom left pad of Pad Bank A, and synths are in Bank B.
Cheers,
Ian
PS if I have this right let me know. Too bad the manual didn't start off with a paragraph like this. I think I forgot to talk about the different Parts in the Tracks and how this will affect things. Let me think about this some more while I do my day job.
Last edited by Ian Canefire on Mon May 20, 2013 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.