
By NearTao
Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:42 pm
bees80 wrote:NearTao wrote:bees, this is the internet... where everybody's voice matters
hence the reason why i feel less motivation to check this forum and reply..


bees80 wrote:NearTao wrote:bees, this is the internet... where everybody's voice matters
hence the reason why i feel less motivation to check this forum and reply..

Menco wrote:Or Akai stopped partnership with GetSatisfaction cause Akai users refuse to be satisfied.

tmpc wrote:Menco wrote:Or Akai stopped partnership with GetSatisfaction cause Akai users refuse to be satisfied.
Do you honestly think the way Akai handled the whole Touch / DisplayLink / macOS High Siera problem was OK? I was one of the people trying to help people by uploading earlier MPC versions as Akai didn't provide access to them.

Menco wrote:There is a lot to be said about Akai, cause they dropped more balls than Tiki Barber did in his whole career.
But in the right hands and minds the X/ Live and One are very capable machines. When the Ren and Studio came out people wanted a standalone machine. Akai made a standalone MPC line. People wanted better FX. Akai implemented AIR FX. People wanted this, and people want that. People want an MPC and Daw in a one stop box. Akai is trying hard to do all that. And people still aren’t happy. And of course these MPC’s are far from perfect. It’s nearly impossible trying to cover so much ground and be perfect at it. But people don’t seem to understand that if you have such high demands and expect it to be perfect that it’s very hard to be satisfied.

tmpc wrote:Menco wrote:There is a lot to be said about Akai, cause they dropped more balls than Tiki Barber did in his whole career.
But in the right hands and minds the X/ Live and One are very capable machines. When the Ren and Studio came out people wanted a standalone machine. Akai made a standalone MPC line. People wanted better FX. Akai implemented AIR FX. People wanted this, and people want that. People want an MPC and Daw in a one stop box. Akai is trying hard to do all that. And people still aren’t happy. And of course these MPC’s are far from perfect. It’s nearly impossible trying to cover so much ground and be perfect at it. But people don’t seem to understand that if you have such high demands and expect it to be perfect that it’s very hard to be satisfied.
I won't even go into all of the buggy software issues. But, tell me why they can't do a simple thing like make all of the MPC software revisions downloadable? Or, why they can't spec the computer / OS requirements on their web site? Sorry man, those things are inexcusable.
Menco wrote:People are looking at Akai and their future updates with all the ‘maybe they’ll change this or add that’ hopes. And if that is your mindset you will be disappointed and unsatisfied till the last MPC is sold. So instead look at what YOU can do about it. Either find your way around all the **** and accept it will never be perfect, or just sell the damn MPC and look for something else. But since a lot of people don’t do that and keep waiting and stay thirsty for that next disappointing update, a lot of Akai users will never be satisfied.


Menco wrote:
People are looking at Akai and their future updates with all the ‘maybe they’ll change this or add that’ hopes. And if that is your mindset you will be disappointed and unsatisfied till the last MPC is sold. So instead look at what YOU can do about it. Either find your way around all the **** and accept it will never be perfect, or just sell the damn MPC and look for something else. But since a lot of people don’t do that and keep waiting and stay thirsty for that next disappointing update, a lot of Akai users will never be satisfied.