Support and discussion for all of Akai’s modern standalone MPCs including the MPC X / X SE, MPC Live 1, 2 & 3, MPC One / One+, MPC Key 37/61.
By johnnyblotter Mon Jul 12, 2021 2:15 pm
Hi folks. After many years of DAW production I have made the decision to return to MPC Land. The main reason is that I have a chunk of boom-bap tracks that are pretty much there, but in some cases DAW timing is just too jittery and inconsistent. I used the classic 2000 for many years before switching to a DAW so I know that machine inside and out. Basically my plan is to recreate (more or less) the tracks I have by moving the samples to the MPC and re-sequencing. I've spent a long time getting my sounds how I want them, so mainly I need rock solid timing/swing. I know a 2000xl would be great for this but because of speed/budget/limited interface inputs I'm wondering if the MPC One would do the job just as well and faster. I'm an old head and a drummer and sensitive to granular timing issues. But I would be into sequencing in the MPC One, exploding the tracks/exporting/importing and finishing in Logic, I'm just not sure if the MPC ONE is mature enough yet to do all this reliably and with the real classic timing feel. Any feedback is super appreciated..thanks very much.
By kaydigi Mon Jul 12, 2021 4:00 pm
The new MPC has a clean/neutral sound that's usually first thing people mention when coming from the 2000's.

Also since you are using a MAC please note there are no drivers for Big Sur/Monterey. So while the software works you can only use the MPC one to offload tracks from the SD Card,usb drive.

I would read the manual though and make sure the MPC can do everything you want it to do. You used a 2000 so you should be okay with the massive amount of menu diving you have to do on the One.
By johnnyblotter Thu Jul 15, 2021 1:21 am
Yeah there's no real point in getthing the machine if it's going to be as jittery as Logic. The more I dig around this subject, the more I think the only answer is to save up for a 3k or mpc 60ii, or just live with the computer jitter. Most of the stuff I watch people doing on the One has the same sort of not-quite-there thing going on.
By johnnyblotter Thu Jul 15, 2021 2:38 am
It's a bit esoteric but it's why the Linn machines (3000/60) swing better than anything else. I pulled this off gearslutz from some dude as a summary...

"Enter a MIDI sequence into your DAW. Route the audio from the virtual instrument to a audio track and record. Now, go back and check the timing of accuracy of the printed audio vs your MIDI sequence: transients will likely be anywhere from 50-200 samples before or after their intended beat.

The “magic” of the MPC is in the accuracy of its timing, whether straight or swung. And this only applies to the Linn machines (60/3000) and the 4000. The 100, 1000, 2000, 2500 & 5000 are just as sloppy as a computer."

Some people aren't maniacal about slight timing variances..unfortunately I am a little nuts about it and there's zero doubt the 3000/60 is much groovier than anything else because it has more solid timing.
User avatar
By MPC-Tutor Thu Jul 15, 2021 9:59 am
On the flip side, many people insist that the MPC60 does some mystical unique magic to your drums due to irregularities in the sequencer, which seems to be the opposite of what is being claimed here, I do think some of this is purely down to people's own biased perceptions. I mean there's a whole generation claiming the MPC2000XL has a classic, vintage warmth, but at the time of release many were claiming it was brittle and harsh. I personally thought it just sounded fine, as I'd expect a piece of gear that cost me £1500 and wouldn't have given it a second thought had I not seen all the discussions about it online.

I appreciate the individual desire to find a machine that works exactly for you, but perhaps people sometimes start overthinking this stuff?
By johnnyblotter Thu Jul 15, 2021 10:13 am
The 3000 and 60 are tighter than any of the other machines. I think the classic bounce we all love is mostly from the 3000/60/SP-1200. As a drummer I totally notice this kind of inconsistency in the DAW and I used to notice it on the 2000. It's a bit subtle, but those small variances can make or break a groove. It's enough to make me consider switching to a looper-based approach like Mark Rebillet or something.