By joegrant413
Wed Feb 26, 2025 10:03 pm
If you have some Presets you think highly of, please call them out. Thx.

SuperKonquer wrote:Now that I ponder about it, I don't believe there is another way to assign all the different aftertouch options the way the NI plugs do. Other than macros, I don't think there is an easy way to make as a expressive patch. For me, the aftertouch options alone are worth the price of admission.
B-Wise wrote:jpeg wrote:Hopefully Akai dont stop their teamup with AIR instruments; cos that connect has brought alot of value to the MPC platform.
That's less likely to happen since they're both owned by inMusic & Akai gives them them an easy way to make money & promote their brand.
What made you say this?
Or are you just saying your random thoughts out loud?
There's nothing in this post or elsewhere that would indicate that Akai & Air would end their partnership. If anything, Akai working NI seems to indicate that Akai is open to working with more outside companies in the future, which wouldn't be the first plugins to do this (Odyssey was made by Wayoutware). Maybe it something that has to do with how OS3.0 is constructed & some new potential capabilities of the desktop software.
jpeg wrote:Actually I forgot that Inmusic owned AIR Instruments; so I was just having random thoughts based on seeing how people are swept up in the hype of having NI sounds on MPC.
So was thinking the Akai marketing guys would likely prioritize NI instruments and sounds coming to MPC; rather then persuing further offerings from AIR insturments as hype sells, so the NI stuff might become their focus.
MPC-Tutor wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTNgZQIqAuA?si=-D5rYhf1yQLXLLM0&t=361
These NI plugins seem nothing more than a re-purposed Fabric running a different sound library.
Big Tick wrote:MPC-Tutor wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTNgZQIqAuA?si=-D5rYhf1yQLXLLM0&t=361
These NI plugins seem nothing more than a re-purposed Fabric running a different sound library.
Please provide proof before making such a claim. Or don't present it as a fact when, in reality, you don't know.

jpeg wrote:The evidence was already posted in this thread.

jaymack wrote:He was comparing the way the plug-in works. Don't see what you think he was getting wrong here

dustyslices wrote:does it really matter if it's based off of your code or air code or anyones ? bottom line is it's just another in house sample playback engine and definitely not NI kontakt which is what 90% of people were arguing about.
Big Tick wrote:dustyslices wrote:does it really matter if it's based off of your code or air code or anyones ? bottom line is it's just another in house sample playback engine and definitely not NI kontakt which is what 90% of people were arguing about.
It doesn't matter of course. I just don't like when opinions are stated as facts. It's a modern internet disease.
And with that, I'll go back to code....
SuperKonquer wrote:The base presets for theses plug-ins are decent enough but what really makes them glow is the motion control and the assignable aftertouch. I never really used MPC much for aftertouch before but these plugs make it dead simple to assign aftertouch to a pad and in many different ways.
Now that I ponder about it, I don't believe there is another way to assign all the different aftertouch options the way the NI plugs do. Other than macros, I don't think there is an easy way to make as a expressive patch. For me, the aftertouch options alone are worth the price of admission.