Share your knowledge on these two classic MPCs

By 2wice Fri Sep 09, 2005 12:49 am
will do
User avatar

By Nino304 Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:59 pm
2wice, u made the FAQ..... giving u the envious look behind my locs 8) LOL. Good sh!t.... I'ma def checc that out. -uno-
User avatar

By drumat!c Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:24 pm
i'm not a fan of what Windows does to the audio disk when converting from 12->16->12-bit. Same thing occurs when importing a 16-bit .snd mpc-3000 file. It totally flattens the sound....also it supposedly "normalizes" the data but I can't tell much of a difference.

Good to know you all enjoy it!

Just my 3 cents.

By 2wice Sat Sep 10, 2005 12:13 am
drumat!c wrote:i'm not a fan of what Windows does to the audio disk when converting from 12->16->12-bit. Same thing occurs when importing a 16-bit .snd mpc-3000 file. It totally flattens the sound....also it supposedly "normalizes" the data but I can't tell much of a difference.

Good to know you all enjoy it!

Just my 3 cents.


I agree 100%, I think with the 60 you just have to sample in your sounds. Imports and conversions sound like chit. If I have a wav I want to use on the 60 then I just run a line out on the PC to the MP. That program OmniFlop doesn't actually let you edit, manipulate, or even see the data, it reads your disk and creates an "image" of the contents allowing you to re-create an exact replica to use in the machine the disk was created with.

By elmacaco Sat Sep 10, 2005 1:47 am
Imported sounds handle the high end better, but you have more control sampling into the 60 on the sound.

I use both.

By earwolf Sat Sep 10, 2005 10:24 pm
will omniflop image sp1200 disks on xp with no quality loss?
User avatar

By DJAndreas Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:59 am
F*ck saving shyt, too much work. Just do a beat and move on , f*ck it, do another one. Keep it live, I dont go back in time, but hey, thats me