Post your questions, opinions and reviews of the MPC1000. This forum is for discussion of the OFFICIAL Akai OS (2.1). If you wish to discuss the JJ OS, please use the dedicated JJ OS forum
By kingquota Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:57 pm
feel free to add what ever you like, kinda like the things you notice that aren't really written down anywhere

i noticed, that the pad sensitivity on all the pads went up to 9.
i noticed, that the os takes an extra meg from sample space...

it also seems thatmy dead pads are a bit more responsive...?
By sparq Fri Jan 20, 2006 5:59 pm
kingquota wrote:feel free to add what ever you like, kinda like the things you notice that aren't really written down anywhere

i noticed, that the pad sensitivity on all the pads went up to 9.
i noticed, that the os takes an extra meg from sample space...

it also seems thatmy dead pads are a bit more responsive...?
alot of system settings may have to be re-adjusted. which is understandable. this is not the ordinary bug update. this is basically a re-write of the OS. so you may have to re-adjust some of the system settings and parameters.
User avatar

By soyo Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:14 pm
I noticed that this OS is friggin SWEET!!! Thanks AKAI!!!

Image

EDIT: Some sound volumes has been changed in my programs.
Im not sure if its the velocity, mixer settings or something else.

It might have something to do with that the standard level of a sound was set to 70 in os 1.07 and in os 2.10 its 100.

I dont know we should look in to this further.
Last edited by soyo on Sat Jan 21, 2006 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

By xparis001 Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:33 pm
OMG. trim with Q link - giggity giggity!!!!

By aflo Fri Jan 20, 2006 6:41 pm
I also noted that the master volume reset to -12. But somethign i've noticed must be my retardedness. I sliced a sample into 16, made a new program all while previewing it and listening to it to make it sound good. I then went back to the main menu and assigned the created program and when i tried to play it on my pads no sound was coming out. Have i missed something?

By pad-ophiliac Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:17 pm
my master volume has been set to -12 since day one.

By *valentin* Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:22 pm
You could switch from the MIXER to the EFFECTS on the same screen, that shit is ill son.

By sparq Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:28 pm
*valentin* wrote:You could switch from the MIXER to the EFFECTS on the same screen, that **** is ill son.
yeah, all of that was in my videos.

to get a better look at what and how, take a look at my video thread in my sig.

By *valentin* Fri Jan 20, 2006 7:30 pm
oh i didnt know, i never seen your os 2 videos cus my computer sucks and it takes 2 hours to download a video, i was gonna do it last time but it took to long.
User avatar

By Antonym Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:52 pm
here's somethign potentially ugly.

in step edit, i used to be able to hit shift/down and then scroll to select multiple objects.

now, when i hit shift down, it still highlights multiple objects, but the second i scroll, it unhilights!!

why did they take that function away?
User avatar

By Antonym Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:53 pm
correction - it's just different now, the data wheel is no longer implemented in this function

it's just shift/down, and you hold down. this selects multiple notes.

ooook
exciting
User avatar

By Lampdog Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:29 pm
I will leave this thread as is for everyone to post with problems, disgusts and joys, same as the author intended. ALL other new OS problem threads will be locked/deleted. This is so that everyone will have a CENTRAL place to post up their thoughts and junk. Sparq, u wit me?
User avatar

By Antonym Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:34 pm
i think you should rename the thread in that case to avoid confusion

By adl1 Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:40 pm
the new os doesn't work for me

i installed it and it didn't work, i followed the steps though.... i'm pissed off, just phoned akai and they said i was the first with that friggin problem

my mpc is still under warranty though

what should i do???
User avatar

By Lampdog Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:43 pm
Antonym wrote:i think you should rename the thread in that case to avoid confusion


I was just re-thinking that same thing..