Post your questions, opinions and reviews of the MPC1000. This forum is for discussion of the OFFICIAL Akai OS (2.1). If you wish to discuss the JJ OS, please use the dedicated JJ OS forum
User avatar
By poast pr Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:39 am
My 1000 for the 2000 xl Maxed out.

I don't have the money to get the 2500 right now. But i really need the 8 outs and want some bigger pads. I'm definitly getting the 2500 in the future. But now this guy stepped up and wants to trade for a 2000 xl in good state with 32 mb, scsi hd, cf card reader, 8 outs and fxcard.
I thought maybe it's a good deal till i have the money for the 2500...

I ain't saying i'll do it!! I just wanna know what exactly i loose when i do it. What´s different in the os etc.

I´ve read almost every post regarding mpc 1000 vs 2000 xl, but i can´t seem to find a good answer. Somebody explain pleaz!
User avatar

By Hypes Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
STFU!
User avatar

By gurulyons Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:11 pm
- RAM: 1k has 128mb, 2kxl has 32mb
- effects are practically the same, 2kxl has 4 busses i think?
- No scsi on 1k
- 6 outs on 1k , 10 on 2kxl
- pratically the same dsp/trim functions

i think thats what you were asking?
User avatar
By ryssen Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:17 pm
poast pr wrote:I´ve read almost every post regarding mpc 1000 vs 2000 xl, but i can´t seem to find a good answer. Somebody explain pleaz!


If you can´t find the differences while reading up on this forum and the specs of the two I think it seems that you´re not deep enough into the MPC to miss the 1000 features you lose or appreciate the few extra skills the 2000 XL might have.
In that case it is very true that all you need is bigger pads and 8 individual outs and I don´t see the hesitation.
User avatar

By Skagarax Wed Apr 12, 2006 1:37 pm
2XL - less ram, less portability, more everything else.

If you are experienced efficient with optimising your samples, and don't need to carry it around, you will get more studio flexibility / options with the 2XL.
User avatar

By poast pr Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:13 pm
thanx for the replies... and for the peeps with negative replies.... thanx very much u are too kind especially hypes! :roll:

And i know the mpc 1000 inside out for ur information, why are peeps always assuming everyone who posts is a newbie?

I'm not, i just wanted to hear some oppinions... it's not a little decision!
User avatar

By ryssen Wed Apr 12, 2006 2:42 pm
poast pr wrote:And i know the mpc 1000 inside out for ur information, why are peeps always assuming everyone who posts is a newbie?


If you are familiar with your 1000 and know the terminology it´s rather easy to compare the two models by checking the specs and reading the manual of the 2000XL. Only you know what you use in the 1000 and what functions are essential to be on the 2000XL, it´s an easy comparison if you just can interpret the specs, which one can if one have picked up the terminology and experience on samplers and sequencers.
User avatar
By g4s Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:10 pm
Relax and keep the MPC1K until you're able to buy the MPC2.5K. The pads on my XL were better and the tilt screen; other than that the 1K beats it hands down in workflow, OS, processing speed, etc, in my opinion. Pound for pound, it's the best MPC in a long time (fully maxed.)

Ignoring the physical differences, the 2.5K OS is more like the 1K than the XL too. Also, the 1K is more likely to see new OS updates now than the XL (although this may not be such an issue for those that think the latter is already perfect.)

G4s
User avatar

By poast pr Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:31 pm
ryssen wrote:
poast pr wrote:And i know the mpc 1000 inside out for ur information, why are peeps always assuming everyone who posts is a newbie?


If you are familiar with your 1000 and know the terminology it´s rather easy to compare the two models by checking the specs and reading the manual of the 2000XL. Only you know what you use in the 1000 and what functions are essential to be on the 2000XL, it´s an easy comparison if you just can interpret the specs, which one can if one have picked up the terminology and experience on samplers and sequencers.


Ok i agree, but i've read the manuals. And trust me i think in the 8 years gaining experience making beats, i KNOW about sequensers, samples etc.

I just want to know some info about for example the speed of the processors, the time it takes to load samples with a cf in the 2000 xl compared to the 1000 etc.

These are things i can't seem to find easily, that's why i ask ur oppinion.
User avatar

By bhunt Wed Apr 12, 2006 7:47 pm
the 2xl, 4k and 3ks are turtles compared to the 1k.
User avatar

By Spirez Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:34 pm
If someone wants to swap a maxed XL for the 1k they must think the 1k's better :wink:

I'd keep it and save for a 2500 rather than go XL. Things like not being able to play more than 4 programs in a sequence simultaneously put me off the XL. And a slower workflow, less RAM, no USB etc all turn me off it, even though it's obviously a capable machine
User avatar

By Antonym Thu Apr 13, 2006 4:31 pm
2000xl is good, but tired. let it rest, stick to the 1000.