ph0cus wrote:who said akai did read these threads anyway?.. its not an akai forum.
But who said that they didnt?
Or who said that any kind of rep for Akai dosnt read this thread?
Or who said that a Akai rep is not a member of this forum?
I cant believe that you would ass-u-me that at all
Why? Not because I have faith in Akai but because I read just about all these threads and happen to know that info do get to Akai from these forums. Just because they arent acting as fast as we would like does not mean that at all. Then as soon as they fix whatever bug you have a problem with....... ooooh GLORY,GLORY AKAI YOUR THE BEST.
_Stilo_ wrote:debonaire wrote:If akai REALLY read these threads theyda got sh!t right a loooooong time ago.
They're slow as molasses....& 1 step above retardation.
You seem to have no idea how labor-intensive it is to develop a software for such a piece of hardware. It is not possible to wait and beta-test until even the slightest bug is ironed out, cause then Akai would be outrun by the competitors.
To speak of Akai techs as "retarded" is simply disrespectful.
Stilo.
And yes Stilo your right along with the every day politics on having a job like that IT IS NOT EASY. To explain it would be a waste of time.
Yes I understand there are other companies out there that dont put out buggy machines now that is a hands down fact but even those companies are not 100% even they are not perfect. We are all human and do the best with what we got at that point in time.
If you dont know the trend this is how it goes.
1. Akai creates machine
2. Machine have bugs
3. Akai fixes and update
4. Machine finally complete whenever the last update and fix is created
Get over it. It is the HISTORY of Akai and they still gives us the BEST sampling drum machines ever. The bandwagon is full of cats that complain. Report bugs or dont participate is your option but dont knock someone else for doing so because if they did not .......well I wont get into that but lets just say it does pay off.
Now take that how you want it.
