
By Abnormal Science
Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:31 pm
did you miss the example that was given? That should work with what he recored... it does not work properly.


TBonus76 wrote:There is no way to "improve" the autochop function. The nature of what it is trying to do is what makes it not accurate... kind of like when you are trying to manually chop a sample that has no definate transients and you are not sure exactly where to chop it. Auto chop, by nature, is a function that is better performed by humans than by a machine.




rinseout wrote:2. I f i chop manually theres also sth going on. I zoom all the way in and make sure the start of the chop is on point but when i convert to sliced samples it always chops about 2400 samples earlier then selected.
Noone ever bothered?

I like the view of old pgm mode and i really hope that it will never be removed..

