By risri
Sun Jun 20, 2004 6:19 am
Hello
I would be interested in hearing from any MPC users (60, 3000, 2000, 4000, 1000) that now use or have tried the Roland MV 8000 extensively.
I am new to the whole MPC thing and semi new to recording.
I recently bought an MPC 3000 LE and I am not sure I did the right thing?
Dont get me wrong, I do really like it, but I am not sure it was THE piece that I should have got.
I also just bought (should arrive next week) PT HD. I was using MOTU's Digital Performer...hated it, hated it, hated it and oh yeah, hated it!...except Mach V...still learning it though.
I tried Pro Tools and was very impressed by its simplicity.
However, I am not interested in "composing" in Pro Tools or on/inside any DAW. I am a musician first and it doesnt come naturally to me to sit at a computer and compose. Tweaking synths, playing my parts and banging out rythms on an MPC or drum machine just feels right for me. You know... power on, press record and flow.
I primarily intend to use Pro Tools for over dubbing, tracking vocals/gtrs/bass, editing and mixing as the plug ins are amazing.
But for sequencing, sampling and composing, I bought an MPC 3000 LE. So far, I do love it...it is my first hardware sequencer/sampler box and I find it to be very condusive to creating/composing music. It is like an instrument unto itself. The sequencer is so tight and natural sounding and the swing function is all that and more. After spending a couple of days on it, my drum programming sounds much better than it ever did on MOTU Digital Performer.
Why cant they make sftware sequencers that tight?
But would I have been better off with the MV 8000 or MPC 4000? I primarily want an external stand alone box/hardware that I can use for sequencing, sampling and composing with my keyboards. I already own a number of hrdwr synths including the xv and jv so i dont need anymore sounds.
So my questions are:
In your opinions, which machine is better suited for integration/sync with Pro Tools?
In your opinions, which machine has a tighter and more natural feeling sequencer?
Which machine is better suited/more versatile for rhythmic sampling/looping and programming?
Which machine will better accomodate/control my midi keyboard set up?
Which machine has a more versatile and feature rich sampler?
Please dont hate on me for this post. I am not trying to start a debate, and I am asking the same questions over on MV sites, just trying to inform and educate myself.
I am not asking which machine is better, but in your opinions (and only those opinions which have used both platforms please) which machine is better suited for my applications as stated above.
If you could help a newbie out, it would be appreciated.
Thanks.
I would be interested in hearing from any MPC users (60, 3000, 2000, 4000, 1000) that now use or have tried the Roland MV 8000 extensively.
I am new to the whole MPC thing and semi new to recording.
I recently bought an MPC 3000 LE and I am not sure I did the right thing?
Dont get me wrong, I do really like it, but I am not sure it was THE piece that I should have got.
I also just bought (should arrive next week) PT HD. I was using MOTU's Digital Performer...hated it, hated it, hated it and oh yeah, hated it!...except Mach V...still learning it though.
I tried Pro Tools and was very impressed by its simplicity.
However, I am not interested in "composing" in Pro Tools or on/inside any DAW. I am a musician first and it doesnt come naturally to me to sit at a computer and compose. Tweaking synths, playing my parts and banging out rythms on an MPC or drum machine just feels right for me. You know... power on, press record and flow.
I primarily intend to use Pro Tools for over dubbing, tracking vocals/gtrs/bass, editing and mixing as the plug ins are amazing.
But for sequencing, sampling and composing, I bought an MPC 3000 LE. So far, I do love it...it is my first hardware sequencer/sampler box and I find it to be very condusive to creating/composing music. It is like an instrument unto itself. The sequencer is so tight and natural sounding and the swing function is all that and more. After spending a couple of days on it, my drum programming sounds much better than it ever did on MOTU Digital Performer.
Why cant they make sftware sequencers that tight?
But would I have been better off with the MV 8000 or MPC 4000? I primarily want an external stand alone box/hardware that I can use for sequencing, sampling and composing with my keyboards. I already own a number of hrdwr synths including the xv and jv so i dont need anymore sounds.
So my questions are:
In your opinions, which machine is better suited for integration/sync with Pro Tools?
In your opinions, which machine has a tighter and more natural feeling sequencer?
Which machine is better suited/more versatile for rhythmic sampling/looping and programming?
Which machine will better accomodate/control my midi keyboard set up?
Which machine has a more versatile and feature rich sampler?
Please dont hate on me for this post. I am not trying to start a debate, and I am asking the same questions over on MV sites, just trying to inform and educate myself.
I am not asking which machine is better, but in your opinions (and only those opinions which have used both platforms please) which machine is better suited for my applications as stated above.
If you could help a newbie out, it would be appreciated.
Thanks.



??WHY


