MPC 1000 - New 1.10 OS2XL

----------------------------------------------------------
Bug Fixes & Change: OS2XL Ver1.10 10-FEB-2009
----------------------------------------------------------
1. [16LEVEL]

It may not work.
Sample disappears.

2. [PROGRAM]

F2[FILTER]
Filter2 EQL does not work

3. [GRID MIDI]

[ZOOM OUT]
A display breaks.

4. [PROGRAM]

[Sample play]
A01:?xxxxxxxx <--- When a sample does not exist.
A noise can be heard.

5. [PROGRAM]

[MODE+DATA WHEEL]
Although a program is changed, it does not change a display.

6. [MAIN]

F1[ 001-END]
[REC+PLAY}
Only one bar is recorded.

<Change>
Two or more samples can be assigned now to an audio track.
It can convert now in song mode.
In addition, start offset was lost.

[Old]
Bar 001.01.00:Sampl1 <-- Only one is assignable.

[New]
Bar 001: Sampl1 <-- assignment in two or more BAR positions is possible.
Bar 002: Sampl2
Bar 003: Sampl3
Bar 010: Sampl4
Bar 019: Sampl5

Refer to the manual for usage.


G4s

It can convert now in song mode.

seems to be a good news.

Those bug fixes are good news, I thought JJ has disapeared.

And I prefer the number version 1.10 than 1.09. I know, it's stupid

Hell yeah! Bugs 2, 3, 4, and 5 were really annoying. Can't wait to fix that. Pretty cool about audio tracks in song mode, too. (It's about time, honestly)

elevated wrote: Pretty cool about audio tracks in song mode, too. (It's about time, honestly)

Try it before you start your celebration.

Lol, I already got a bottle of champagne and everything...

It doesn't work right?

g4s wrote: <Change>
Two or more samples can be assigned now to an audio track.
It can convert now in song mode.
In addition, start offset was lost.

[Old]
Bar 001.01.00:Sampl1 <-- Only one is assignable.

[New]
Bar 001: Sampl1 <-- assignment in two or more BAR positions is possible.
Bar 002: Sampl2
Bar 003: Sampl3
Bar 010: Sampl4
Bar 019: Sampl5

Refer to the manual for usage.


G4s

whoaw! audio track just got interesting..

Here's the link to more details on the changes to Audio Tracks:
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~mpc1000/os2 ... otrack.htm

Looks like a nice move!

hi guys, I've just mess around with that long-awaited-change in audio tracks. My first conclusion is it needs workflow improvements.

First of all, it seems that the "click" is always recorded. I couldn't manage not to have it recorded in the sequence.

As i was afraid of, the different takes don't overlap.

In my mind, it would be nice if the < and > cursors could change the new "bar" option like in that screen :


and it would be cool if start+rec would record from the beginning and overdub+rec start from the "bar" point you've just selected with < > for instance.

Here are my thoughts for the moment, I didn't try song convert compatibility coz i think audiotracks are far from being dope now.

Maybe it deserves a special topic and an intervention from mike feedback lol

You guys are killing my buzz

le rat wrote:
First of all, it seems that the "click" is always recorded. I couldn't manage not to have it recorded in the sequence.

I don't have that problem

le rat wrote:
As i was afraid of, the different takes don't overlap.

You can use multiple tracks to overlap

le rat wrote:and it would be cool if start+rec would record from the beginning and overdub+rec start from the "bar" point you've just selected with < > for instance.

REC+PLAY START = play from beginning
REC+PLAY = play from selected point

le rat wrote:Here are my thoughts for the moment, I didn't try song convert compatibility coz i think audiotracks are far from being dope now.

Maybe it deserves a special topic and an intervention from mike feedback lol

SONG Convert now works as well as SONG Record.

Audio tracks are definitely improving.

le rat wrote:Here are my thoughts for the moment, I didn't try song convert compatibility coz i think audiotracks are far from being dope now.

Maybe it deserves a special topic and an intervention from mike feedback lol

I haven't bothered to install OS2XL yet, mainly because I'm not liking what I'm reading about how simult records a note to the sequence for each pad that's simulted. that just seems counterintuitive to the purpose of simult. say I have a my drums laid down for a beat, but now I want to thicken them up by simulting 2 other pads from 1. now do I have to re-record it to record those extra notes that the one pad is now triggering?

and what if I want to go backwards and remove a simulted pad? do I have to re-record the performance so that those extra notes are removed? or go back and erase each note manually? you can't really automatically remove those notes, because how do you tell the difference between a note that was recorded from a simulted pad and one that I just recorded individually? if I recorded it individually on it's own, I wouldn't want that to be removed.

And the additions to audio tracks do not impress me, I'm still never going to use them. Just give us direct record already and be done with it!

my bad sovereign,

I couldn't reproduce the metronome "click" stuff. I think I was too excited when i tried the new function and and i spoke too fast.

Audio tracks are definitely improving.

Okay, here's my review on the changes to Audio Tracks:

- They do work properly in song mode, including the Convert to Sequence feature. Dope, finally!

- Now... The change where you can select separate samples for each bar has done nothing but ANNOY me. Either there are some bugs to work out, or I was doing something wrong. The Audio Tracks no longer worked fast and flawlessly for me.

Anyone have an opinion on what exactly JJ had in mind with this change? I don't see the purpose.

elevated wrote:Anyone have an opinion on what exactly JJ had in mind with this change? I don't see the purpose.

first step of implementing 2500 direct record.